From: Eastman
To: ; ;
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 3:59 PM

223 S. 64TH AVE
"I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. ... corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavour to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed."  -- A. Lincoln
"The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic State itself. That, in its essence, is Fascism ? ownership of government by an individual, by a group or by any controlling private power."  -- Franklin D. Roosevelt 
(After staying three months at Bernard Baruch's Hobcow Plantation in North Carolinia without a phone (in 1944 during World War II !!!), Roosevelt's health recovered briefly just long enough for him to win re-election, afterwhich he soon unexpectedly died  (the people never suspected and could not imagine how he could have seemed so healthy during the campaign etc. --  note that Baruch was also close to Woodrow Wilson, whose  Presidency was run by his new sexy wife (his first wife suddenly died the week the U.S. entered World War I in 1917) when he was a helpless invalid -- and yes, earlier, Wilson's health did recover briefly for a re-election run in 1916 under the disingenuous slogan "He kept us out of war." )
 "It is from numberless diverse acts of courage and belief that human history is shaped. Each time a person stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, s/he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a current which can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance."    -- Robert Kennedy (JFK's brother and Attorney General  whom the Oligarchy also feared)

"9-11 the day Sharon moved Americans to kill Arabs"

Notes on a telephone coversation by Dick Eastman

 "The war against terrorism cannot end before Saddam Hussein is out of power in Iraq"
    -- Senator Joseph Lieberman, Fox News Sunday, December, 2001 (Tony Snow then asked:  "Are you sure it is because all the Iraqis are 'terrorists,' Senator?)
I just got off the phone with Mark Bilk.  In our conversation -- prompted by my reading him the subject heading of this message which I had just begun to write when he phoned -- we made some important deductions that, as far as I know, have never been made explicit.  Let me just share with you my post-call notes as I write them.
Mark objected to naming Sharon because their was not direct proof of his involvement, although, he added, it has just come to light that the owner of the WTC, Silverstein, has just been discovered to have close personal ties with Ariel Sharon.  Mark argued that we know that Sharon had to have known the frame-up was coming, but that his instrumental role can not yet been proven.
I responded by saying that, while a disinformation heckler tomato-throwing operative would never accept the logic, that, in fact, any reasonable person with all of the relevant facts, can be certain that Sharon and Mossad had to have been actively involved in the entire operation from the outset.  The reasoning behind this statement is as follows.
We know by the fact that the Boeing did not crash at the Pentagon and that the building was hit by a smaller aircraft which fired at least one missile into the building ahead of its own penetration of the first floor, that such an operation, with standdowns and coverup, had to have involved the top leadership at the Pentagon.  This means that Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfwitz had to have been involved.  And if Wolfowitz was involved, this very high-power advisory group consisting of Richard Perle, Henry Kissinger, Newt Gingrich who were working out of the Pentagon had to have been privy to the plan -- one cannot imagine Rumsfeld and/or Wolfowitz planning the attack on the Pentagon with the aid of some other party and not letting these powerful men in on the secret.  The very notion that these important men -- Perle representing the Rothschilds and Kissinger representing China and the Rockefellers and Gingrich, also a self-proclaimed Rockefeller asset -- would be serving on a committee of the assistant secretary of defense, indicates that even before 9-11 the Pentagon was where the most important operations of the Bush administration were being planned. (This is not to say that Cheney is not intimate with this conspiracy as well, but only that the direct evidence points most unequivocally at the Pentagon leadership.)
Now follow this reasoning closely.
Given that the evidence in the Pentagon attack implicates Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle, Kissinger and Gingrich (and other, smaller fry) we must then ask  -- would these men plan a black-op mass-murder frame-up without the involvement of the CIA  (and of course other agencies like the FBI and the FAA etc.), remembering both the air-interception standdown, the intelligence standdown, and various coverups (like the 97 Israelis who were illegally working with illegal top security passes at both Dulles International  Airport (in D.C., where Flight 77 took off from) and Reagan National (where the Boeing which witnesses saw at the Pentagon, presumably Flight 77, must have landed following its overflight of the just-hit building)  -- that these Israeli's where, months later these identified Isralei infiltrators (did zealous people at the airport detect all of the foreigners in high-security positions and report it?) who were briefly detained, were all subsequently deported by Ashcroft back to Israel with the most minimal back page coverage by the American media --  but only after Reagan National (where "77" landed) became the last of all airports to re-open (after the aircraft was either taken apart like a hot stolen car or else given new "livery" and numbers in the hanger to which it taxied when it set down on 9-11-01.)  SO we have Israelis who obtained illegal-for-them top-security-clearance badges at the two most politically sensitive and espionage-aware airports in the United States, Reagan's runway #15  being only one mile from location of the Pentagon crash. And we have them, like the Israelis who photographed the imploding WTC towers with laughter on their lips -- who told Israeli radio after they also had been deported, that they were sent to witness the event.(!)  (Remember also how phone calls were made to the WTC to persons whose first phonecall out after getting this information was to Israeli intelligence and not to the WTC security people or to U.S. authorities.  Remember too that very few Israeli's died and very few Jews -- the building held 70,000 workers and visitors on a typical day, whereas fewer than 3,000 people died at the Pentagon that day and none of those top CEO's from any banking or world trade firm  -- although the data on this last point has been sketchy.)  So we must assume that Mossad and Sharon must have known about the attack.
But we can say more with confidence in our reliability and validity,  that Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz -- two men directly implicated by the Pentagon false-flag attack proof -- were involved with the help of the CIA and that since the CIA is known to work intimately with Mossad in all operations (for example the CIA had no agents in the field in Central Asia (including Afganistan) at the time of 9-11 and received all of their in-the-field intelligence from from Mossad at this time)  -- as I was saying, we know that the CIA works with Mossad on all of the most important operations; and too we know that Mossad actually infiltrates all branches of the Federal government, including the CIA, so that the CIA could not be engaged in a black-op like the 9-11 frame-up without Mossad being aware of it -- which we know (from events surrounding the WTC attack) that they were informed  -- we must now ask ourselves the following question:
Would a team of Rumsfeld-Wolfowitz-Perle-Gingrich-Myers etc. have have planned 9-11 without first asking if such an operation would be OK with Israel??  In other words, would not these  pro-Israel Zionists not have asked Israel to sign off on the plan to make sure that Israel would not be adversly affected by the "frame-op" -- in other words Israel would have had to have "signed off" on 9-11, at the very least, signalling Rumsfeld-Wolfowitz-Perle-Gingrich-Myers that it was OK (beneficial to Sharon's and Mossad's view of the good of Israel, or at least not harmful to their interests)  to proceed with the false-flag inside-job.
Now we must ask this:
Is it imaginable that Sharon and Mossad would then say to Rumsfeld-Wolfowitz-Perle-Gingrich-Myers --  you may proceed with this unethical operation if you wish, but be informed that Israel is a highly ethical country and we will not soil our hands by becoming involved in so unbecoming an enterprise, so don't ask for our help or the help of those infiltrated 97 agents of ours at Reagan National and Dulles, OK?"
No.  This could not have been Sharon's and Mossad's position on 9-11  -- rather they had to be involved every step of the way  -- the entire Pentagon was not complict in the conspiracy (remember it was the office of Naval Intelligence, which has always been independent from the CIA who were all murdered by the first-floor penetration of missile and jet fighter in the newly renovated section of the Pentagon, where only Naval Intelligence and a few others (targets?) had been moved in!)   as I was saying, the entire Pentagon personel were definitely not complicit -- there were several lower in the organizational pyrimid who had to be kept from suspecting what was being planned -- and so much of the work had to have been conducted outside the US, and certainly not in some cave in Afganistan or some underground nuclear-chemical facility of Saddam Hussein.  The CIA had to have been involved, and that iteself buys Mossad cooperation and involvement.  And the Pentagon Zionist's proven to be complicit by the Pentagon attack evidence, could not possibly have proceeded with the 9-11 opeation without sign-off by Sharon and others in Israel.
ANd I should add, which I did not discuss with Mark, but which has just occured to me to add --  Perle represents the Rothchild interests in the US (as Bernard Baruch did in the period from 1911 to 1956), which means that the City of London (London's Wall Street) was also involved and its invisible intelligence arm, MI6, (the British counterpart to the CIA) also had to be involved simply because of the intimate "special relationship" between British and American and Israeli intelligence serivces, the relationship among their financial establishments, and the family ties among the respective ruling financial, corporate, military  and foreign affairs elites of the U.S. and the U.K.
So yes, the Pentagon evidence (see below) clinches everthing.
Thanks Mark, I think we worked it all out together  -- no new pieces have been introduced here -- everything is established fact, old news  -- but we have fitted it together properly for the first time, we have made an important deduction that no one had yet made explicit -- although I am sure this reasoning has gone through the minds of most informed and intelligent investigators who are not working for the coverup.
So yes  -- I can say it with confidence  "9-11 was the day Sharon moved Americans to kill Arabs"  --
now what were all you discussants saying about First Lieutenant George Bush's military record of 35 years ago versus that of his Bonesman mate and fellow Zionist warhawk, John Kerry  -- don;t let my trivial ramblings disturb your important discussion.
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
Every man is responsible to every other man.
What happened to Flight 77?  After a showy higher altitude approach to the Pentagon as the F-16 flew in at tree-top level for the actual kill -- Flight 77 simply crossed the Jefferson Davis Highway across the part to the George Washington Memorial Parkway to Reagon National Airport on the Potomac -- less than two miles from the attack point -- where it landed and taxied to an undisclosed hanger where it was met by some of the 100 persons, many with criminal records and foreign citizenship, who obtained false airport security badges credentials giving them free access to sensitive airport areas, like ramps, gates, hangers and aircraft.


Also  Reuters:

"More than 70 have been deported or are awaiting deportation proceedings, authorities said."

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - More than 100 employees at two major Washington area airports have been arrested on fraud charges in obtaining restricted airport security badges, government sources said on Tuesday.

The arrests will be announced by Attorney General John Ashcroft later in the day in Alexandria, Virginia, officials said.

The arrests marked a continuing post Sept. 11 crackdown by U.S. law enforcement and transportation authorities on airport security lapses.

Many of the charges -- including those being brought against workers at Washington's Ronald Reagan National Airport and Dulles International Airport outside the capital -- involve allegations that suspects violated immigration and Social Security laws.

Also, the government alleges that many arrested on Tuesday in the greater Washington area lied about criminal records while applying for security badges, the sources said.

It was unclear initially what jobs those employees performed.

As of last week, more than 250 people had been arrested at 11 U.S. airports on charges they fraudulently obtained credentials for access to sensitive airport areas, like ramps, gates and aircraft.

Roughly half have pleaded guilty or have plea agreements pending, authorities said. More than 70 have been deported or are awaiting deportation proceedings, authorities said.
9-11 Frame-up:  The Pentagon Evidence Proves It
Here is the critical information needed to derive an informed opinion of what really happened on September 11, 2001:

Consider what  citizen investigators have uncovered regarding the alleged "attack" on the Pentagon:

1. Pentagon security camera shows
    a.  Too short a plane
    b.  Smoke trail of a missile being fired
    c.  White-hot flash explosion consistent with a missile warhead

2. Photos show wrong crash imprint in the wall

3. Photos show and wrong flash-powder burn darkening the wall

4. Downed lampposts and witnesses each identified a different
     approach path to the Pentagon, the Boeing's and the killer jet's

5. Wrong kind of debris

6. Single piece of right kind of debris shown to have been
    found on the opposite side of the approach path from
    the side of the plane where that particular piece had
    to have come from.

7. Witnesses also

  a. heard a missile

  b. heard a sonic boom prior to blast

  c. smelled burning chordite after the blast

  d. saw a radar blip behaving like a jet-fighter blip

8. No photos of wreckage from inside consistent with the crash

9. Evidence of only one engine and one seat , a pilots seat.

10. A distraction plane, ur engine plane making dives over D.C.
    both photographed, videotaped and shown on BBC, and
    reported (erroneously) by many wintesses as the actual plane
   "diving at an irrecoverable angle)

11.  The attack was made almost horizontally into the first-floor
      level -- consistent with a countour-hugging jet-fighter attack

12. Normal rescuers were prevented from entering the building
   while only certain people, including Rumsfeld himself, conducted
   (screened) victims from the building

13. Rumsfeld had recently been given exclusive power to
  OK air interceptions -- and yet he was in his office the whole
  time the twin towers were hit, and when the Pentagon was
  hit  he went to oversee "rescue" instead of going to the situation
  room where his interception authority could be given  -- he
  arrived at the situation room at about the time the Pennsylvania
  plane (backup for the Pentagon) was finally shot down.

14. The various drills and practices for an air attack on the Pentagon
   including some kind of simulation on 9-11-01 itself, coupled with
   denials that such an attack had been considered possible.

15. Impossible stories by, for example,  John Judge (regarding
     his amazing stewardess friend who claims to have seen the     
     Boeing inside the hole, recognized the plane as the one she
     always flew, recongized her stewardess friend as a victim by
     a photo of her severed arm with the matching "friendship    
     bracelett" they both wore;  that she was passing out
     doughnuts and coffee to the rescue workers with the salvation
     army when the salvation army was nowhere in evidence at the
     scene --  John Judge who is a   professional JFK conspiracy
     theory debunker and discloses that this same stewardess
     friend is also a JFK theory investigator, the same
     John Judge who launched the phony  "People's Investigation
     of   9-11 with a  press conference by stating that the Pentagon
     attack is not something responsible investigators should bother
     investigating  etc. since we "know" the Boeing hit the Pentagon
     and don't want to be a laughing stock etc. -- the People's
     investigation that never once reviewed any of the evidence
     packages I posted  to them --  the same John Judge who to this
     day refuses to debate Dick Eastman on any internet forum and
     whom all --   dare I use the term -- "responsible" 9-11 investigators
     think is  a John Judge who is working for  the coverup, for
     obstruction of justice, and because he does it so badly is himself
     become  one of the proofs of  the frameup along with the known-
     only-to  himself flight attendant who works one of the flights that
     most definitely had to have been regularly monitored by
     US intelligence operatives, probably flight attendents, and
     this one just happened not to take Flight 77 that day by
     happenstance etc.  -- so how about it, Mr. Judge?

16. The deaths of only the CIA's  indepdendent intelligence
    revivals , the Offices of Naval Intelligence  personel, and
    auditors of defense spending contracts etc. alone moved
    into the "newly renovated" section that was hit -- on the side
    where most of the witnesses would be the Arlington Cemetery
    dead or people involved with driving their cars.  Naval Intelligence
    would have independently investigated 9-11 had they lived --
    the investigator that no official has yet conducted -- Wolfowitz
    sure bin Laden had done it  and ready with the solution of invading
    Afganistan on the very first day -- even as they were allegedly 
    taken  by complete suprise only a few hours  before that

See the evidence  photos and witness testimony confirming all of the above and further analysis in support of these conclusions by internationally respected American men of science here: 

and here

Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
Every man is responsible to every other man.
Dick Eastman post of Sept. 18, 2001:
Jerusalem Post, Monday September 17, 2001

Mossad warned CIA of attacks - report By Douglas Davis

LONDON (September 17) - Mossad officials traveled to Washington last
month to warn the CIA and the FBI that a cell of up to 200 terrorists
was planning a major operation, according to a report in the Sunday
Telegraph here yesterday.

The paper said the Israeli officials specifically warned their
counterparts in Washington that "large-scale terrorist attacks on highly
visible targets on the American mainland were imminent." They offered no
specific information about targets, but they did link the plot to
Afghanistan-based terrorist Osama bin Laden, and they told the Americans
there were "strong grounds" for suspecting Iraqi involvement.

(2) The UsaJewish site repeats the story, but adds that Lebanon's Druze
leader Walid Jumblatt believes that Mossad itself is behind the attack
... "to provoke a new war and impoverish and occupy the Middle East,"
Jumblatt was quoted as saying.

(3) I checked the Jerusalem Post, and UsaJewish, for reports on American
Jews killed in the NY attack, but could find no mention of this topic.

(4) Mossad's inside information suggests either (1) it is right that Bin
Laden is behind the attack, OR (2) that Mossad itself may be quilty.
After all, Israel had no qualms about sinking the USS Liberty, and
Israel gains greatly if it can get America to destroy Islam for it.

(5) Thus the importance of thoroughly investigating the unusual share
transactions before the attack. They offer the best way of tracking down
those responsible.

Here is more of the NYT front-page article, A New War and Its Scale,
 by Michael R. Gordon (excerpt from page three):

"The terrorist organizations themselves and the terrorists don't have
targets of high value,"  Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said today on
the Fox News Channel.  "They don't have have armies and navies and air
forces that one can go battle against.  They don't have capital cities with
high-value assets that they're reluctant to lose."

"He added: "Some countries that are harboring terrorists networks do, in
fact, have high-value targets.  They do have capitals.  They do have
armies."  Deputy Secretary of State Paul D. Wolfowitz spoke last week of
ending states who sponsor terrorism."  Officials now say that he misspoke,
that he meant to say that the goal is ending state support.

"In some cases, like Afganistan, that may be a semantic issue since the goal
would be to dislodge the Taliban rulers if they refused to cooperate with
Washington's counter terrorism campaign.

"In other cases, political economic and limited military pressure may be
aplied.  The Bush administration has certainly not committed itself to
invading all the nations on the State Department's list of those found to
help terrorists -- Iran, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Libya, Cuba and North Korea."
I notice that China -- a backer of Latin American narco-terrorists
is not on the list, and neither is Israel, which perhaps, in view of
the foregoing, may very well belong there.

Dick Eastman
223 S. 64th Ave
Yakima, Washington
Every man is responsible to every other man.

(so kill me, already)
And what about Logan Airport, in Boston?
Two Foreign-Owned Companies Have Airport Security in WTC Attack
Foreign Affairs News Keywords: WTC, TERRORISM, NWO
Source: Various
Published: September 16, 2001 Author: Jedediah Smith
Posted on 09/16/2001 12:15:37 PDT by jedediah smith

While it is possible that Tuesday's WTC attack could have been the result of sloppy airport security, the natural suspicion is that the terrorists had inside help to permit them to smuggle their weapons onboard. Obviously this points a finger at the organization and/or persons in charge of security at the airports. The Newark Airport security is handled by the Ports Authority, a quasi-governmental agency which also has security for WTC. The Dulles Airport security is also handled by a government agency. Both of these could easily have been infiltrated by terrorists or their accomplices. But even more interestingly, security at the Logan International Aiport in Boston was contracted out by the Mass. Port Authority to two companies, Globe Aviation Services of Irving, Texas and Huntleigh USA Corp. of St. Louis. If we explore further, some motivation may be uncovered that would give reason for these firms to cooperate with the terrorists.
Huntleigh USA was bought out in 1999 by ICTS International (International Consultants on Targeted Security). [See]
which is headquartered in the Netherlands, and most of their business is in Europe. Chairman Ezra Harel and Menachem Atzmon control 47% of the stock (see
Here is what I had written before Mark Phoned:
The Boeing overflew the Sheraton Hotel and the tape from the video camera on the roof was confiscated immediately.  There was a second security camera facing west attached to the same building from which the five famous pictures of the killer jet's approach and the the subsequent explosion shots. Pictures from that camera were not released either.  And there was the security cam at the gas station on the other side of Washington Blvd. which, like the Sheraton camera, would have caputred the Boeing going over the gas station on its way to the Pentagon  (remember: if the Boeing was indeed over the gas station at all it could not have been the aircraft that knocked down the southmost lamppost that stood south of the Pentagon-parking turn-off overpass.) and this too was never released.  WHY NOT?  WHAT GAIN DOES THE WHITE HOUSE AND PENTAGON DERIVE FROM NOT  ANSWERING THE STRONG "SMALL-PLANE" EVIDENCE THAT IS BELIEVED BY MILLIONS AROUND THE WORLD?  WHAT COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS COULD LEAD THE ADMINISTRATION TO WITHOLD THIS EVIDENCE (ESPECIALLY SINCE THEY ALREADY HAVE RELEASED VIDEO'S THAT SHOW THE FUSELAGE OF THE KILLER JET CONCEALED BEHIND A PARKING-PASS PILLAR IN THE FOREGROUND -- ONE FRAME SELECTED BECAUSE IT IS THE FRAME THAT  SHOWS PART OF A PLANE BUT DISALLOWS IDENTIFICATION OF THE EXACT TYPE OF PLANE -- EXCEPT FOR THE DEDUCTION MADE BY SCIENTIFICALLY TRAINED CITIZENS PROVING THAT THE PLANE BELONGING TO THE VISIBLE TAIL FIN WAS TOO SHORT TO BE THE BOEING.)  "Velasquez says the gas station's security cameras are close enough  to the Pentagon to have recorded the moment of impact. "I've never  seen what the pictures looked like," he said. "The FBI was here  within minutes and took the film."
On the morning of September 11, the present Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff, General Richard B. Myers, was having a routine meeting on Capitol
Hill with Senator Max Cleland. Just before the meeting began,

"While in an outer office, he said, he saw a television report that a plane
had hit the World Trade Center. 'They thought it was a small plane or
something like that,' Myers said. So the two men went ahead with the office
--'American Forces Press Service' 23 October 2001 (1)

The meeting went on for some time. While the two men chatted away, a second
hijacked jet plowed into the World Trade Center's south tower and a third
one into the Pentagon. And still they went on with their meeting.

"Meanwhile, the second World Trade Center tower was hit by another jet.
'Nobody informed us of that,' Myers said. 'But when we came out, that was
obvious. Then, right at that time, somebody said the Pentagon had been hit.'

"Somebody thrust a cell phone in Myers' hand. Gen. Ralph Eberhart, commander
of U.S. Space Command and the North American Aerospace Defense Command was
on the other end of the line 'talking about what was happening and the
actions he was going to take.'
--'American Forces Press Service' 23 October 2001 (1)

Cheney, bush: the Air Force and Army would like a word with you.
- - - - - - - -
Note: Brian Quiq died in a parking lot at 2:00 a.m.about a year ago, run over by some teens on drugs.   The Quigs_Fight yahoogroup, which I moderate,  is dedicated to his memory and his cause.
From: "Brian Downing Quig" <>
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 18:35:23-0700

This writer, who is identified only by, by
example knows what he is talking about. He knows what Mike Ruppert and I
knew immediately and some in this discussion are having a very hard time

The Air Force spokesman confirmed that AFTER the alerts and requests for
INTERCEPTS of the aircraft were received from FAA/ATC, orders from the
HIGHEST LEVEL of the executive branch of the federal government were
received, demanding that the Air Force stand down and NOT follow through
with ESTABLISHED scramble/intercept procedures that morning until
further notice!

The writer is going from something he knows --- somewhere in the
executive branch a STAND DOWN ORDER was issued --- to a pretty good
guess of a probable culprit. The writer is 100% on the mark when he
discribes Cheney's deliberate confusion about the INTERCEPT PROCEDURES.

Cheney needs to explain why he lied about Bush having to make the
decision to shoot down flight 77 on 9-11-01.

I feel that this writer is moving the discussion in the right direction.

Brian Quig


Suspected Israeli Spies Held by U.S.

Wednesday, December 12, 2001

WASHINGTON — Some 60 Israelis, who federal investigators have said are part of a long-running effort to spy on American government officials, are among the hundreds of foreigners detained since the Sept. 11 terror attacks, Fox News has learned.

The Israelis, a handful of whom are described as active Israeli military or intelligence operatives, have been detained on immigration charges or under the new Patriot Anti-Terrorism Law. Federal investigators said some of them failed polygraph questions inquiring about alleged surveillance activities against and in the United States.

There is no indication the Israelis were involved in the Sept. 11 attacks, but investigators suspect that they may have gathered intelligence about the attacks in advance and not shared it.

A highly placed investigator told Fox News there are "tie-ins," but when asked for details flatly refused to describe them. "Evidence linking these Israelis to 9-11 is classified, I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It is classified information," the source said.

An Israeli Embassy spokesman offered categorical denials, and said any suggestion of Israelis spying on or in the United States is simply not true.

But Fox News has learned that one group of Israelis spotted in North Carolina recently is suspected of keeping an apartment in California to spy on a group of Arabs who the U.S. authorities are investigating for links to terrorism.

Numerous classified documents obtained by Fox News indicate that even prior to Sept. 11, as many as 140 other Israelis had been detained or arrested in a secretive and sprawling investigation into suspected espionage by Israelis in the United States.

Investigators from numerous government agencies are part of a working group that has been compiling evidence in the case since the mid-1990s. These documents detail hundreds of incidents in cities and towns across the country that investigators say quote "may well be an organized intelligence-gathering activity."

Investigators are focusing part of their efforts on Israelis who said they are art students from the University of Jerusalem or Bezalel Academy and repeatedly made contact with U.S. government personnel by saying they wanted to sell cheap art or handiwork.

Documents say they "targeted" and penetrated military bases, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Federal Bureau of Investigations, dozens of government facilities and even secret offices and unlisted private homes of law enforcement and intelligence personnel.

Another part of the investigation has resulted in the detention and arrest of dozens of Israelis working at kiosks in American malls, where they had been selling toys called "Puzzlecar" and "Zoomcopter."

Investigators suspected a front. Shortly after the New York Times and Washington Post reported the detentions of Israelis on immigration charges last month, the carts began vanishing.

Another draft post, this one dated 9/24/2001 on my hard drive Windows 98 documents file:
US government officials today released a photograph of Mohammed Atta and a
man they think is Abdulaziz Alomari, key members of the terrorist team who
flew American Airlines Flight 11 into the north tower of the World Trade
Center, killing 81 passengers and crew.

They were filmed as they passed through Portland Airport on their way to
Boston, where they hijacked the flight to Los Angeles. Atta, 33, who had
received pilot's training, is believed to have flown the doomed airliner.
The security picture appears to end the debate about whether Atta really was
one of the hijackers. Yesterday his father claimed he had spoken to him
since the disaster.

In a second breakthrough, officials now say they are succeeding in following
the money trail used by the hijackers to fund their operation. It is now
believed that all 19 hijack suspects shared a single contact within the US
who provided them with cash.

The money was used to pay for flight lessons, rent and even withdrawals at
automatic cashpoints. Two of the hijackers, Hani Hanjour and Majed Moqed,
were pictured together withdrawing money from a cash machine in Florida. The
FBI and the Federal Reserve have sent letters to banks throughout the
country, asking for any records of financial transactions involving the 19
suspects, including credit card receipts.

Investigators hope recent changes in international banking agreements will
allow them to follow the money back to sources outside the US, particularly
the prime suspect Osama bin Laden. Analysts are also checking reports of
unusual trading in the US stock options market before the attack. An
extraordinary number of trades were betting that American Airlines stock
price would fall. A similar inquiry has been launched in Britain.

But the investigation into the terrorists is being hampered by questions of
identity. It appears that five of the hijackers were using stolen
identities. Many of them seem to have adopted the personas of real-life
commercial and military pilots.

In Saudi Arabia, five of the alleged hijackers have emerged, alive and
astonished to see their names and photographs appearing on satellite
television. Yesterday, the Londonbased Asharq al-Awsat newspaper said it had
interviewed Mr Alomari in Riyadh, and that he had left the US in April 2000.
It said the American-educated engineer had reported to police that his
passport was stolen when his flat in Denver was burgled in 1995.

Ahmed al-Shehri, a Saudi diplomat told another newspaper that details of
another hijacker matched his son Waleed, who now lives in Morocco.

The pilot with Saudi Arabian Airlines graduated four years ago from
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Florida. Another Saudi pilot, Said
Hussein al-Ghamdi, whose picture was released by the US authorities may in
fact be living in Tunis and may have been falsely accused. While the
American authorities remain convinced that Bin Laden masterminded the
attacks, they are also hinting that a number of states may have helped. The
first criminal charges arising from the attacks have been filed against
three Detroit men - Karim Koubriti, 23, Ahmed Hannan, 33, and Farouk
Ali-Haimoud, 21, who are accused of fraud and misuse of visas, passports and
other immigration documents.

Further details are also emerging about what happened on the hijacked planes
themselves. Federal investigators believe that some of the pilots and
co-pilots of the aircraft were murdered before the planes crashed.

FBI technicians have recovered fragments of conversations from within one of
the doomed cockpits; much of it is described however as "a jumbled mixture
of grunts and screams".

They have confirmed that the bodies of two stewardesses from United Flight
93, which crashed in Pennsylvania, were found with their hands bound.

The FBI has launched a nationwide manhunt for 190 people it believes may
have information relating to the terrorist attacks. As many as 37 on the
bureau's "watch list" are believed to have had flight training. Some had
booked reservations on flights scheduled to take place after last week's
attacks, including flights coming out of Boston and San Antonio this
weekend. FBI officials are seeking to play down fears of a second wave of
attacks on Saturday. Spokeswoman Mindy Tucker said there is "no credible
evidence", although Americans have been warned to be vigilant.

There is, however, new evidence of the extent to which Bin Laden has been
seeking to arm himself. According to the Russian news agency Itar-Tass, the
Russian secret services prevented a deal to buy weapons grade uranium by a
Pakistani company controlled by Bin Laden.
And this very very important one from Oct. 6, 2001:
From: "Dick Eastman" <>
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2001 10:22 PM
Subject: THE ESATABLISHMENT KNEW, both top republicans and top democrats: TIME FOR MASS RESIGNATIONS/MPEACHMENTS
Mr. Eastman,
I read your article on the rense site. The person who sent you some notes
on connie rice, did not have the fortune of seeing rumsfield on the 9th of
sept in an interview on fox news like I did. it was a late sunday afternoon
or early evening, The interview was with brit hume I am pretty sure, and
rumsfield was unusually happy about the coming week where his defense budget
cuts would be reversed, in fact he was inferring that his budget would be
increased by a large % when congress would come to understand how important
defense was to national security. It was such an interesting interview I
made my wife sit down and watch it which is very unusual because like most
women, she is not into the global or national events...and my vibes from it
were not good. That sept 11 evening interview with the pentagon at 9 pm had
all the big wigs on, again rumsfield was the point man for the press
conference. after his speech the first question taken from a reporter was
right to rumsfield and he asked him if intelligence or anyone high up in the
government had any knowledge of the events. Rumsfield looked like he got
punched in the stomach, looked down and away and said " I cant answer any
questions of a national security issue" I was like what heck, total
destruction and this guy looks away as guilty as sin and wont answer the
reporters question. if you get your hands on the video footage of the press
conf, its a real eye opener. Bottom line, they knew, what other reason was
pres bush out of dc for over a month, and "on vacation finding peace and
quiet. " More crap. just how stupid do they think we are. Today my wife
showed me a picture of a 31 year old fire man she went to school with and is
listed as "missing". They can lie all they want, all you have to do is
follow the " wacko conspiarcy writings for the last 10-20 years to see where
we are headed next.

(end of letter)
WTC destroyed for many reasons (many people needed incentive to participate in the false-flag black-op mass-murder  frameup) -- One definite outcome of the collapse of the North Tower was the destruction of federal "gold case" evidence.  How convenient was the WTC crashbombing for defendents Greenspan, Morgan, Chase, and Goldman Sachs. The investigation was being conducted from the 24th floor of the North Tower where the Securities and Exchange Commission had offices and stored records.  The defendants in the GATA/Howe lawsuit were: the Bank for International Settlements; Alan Greenspan, chairman of the Board of Governors of the U.S. Federal Reserve System and a director of the BIS; William J. McDonough, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and a director of the BIS; five major bullion banks, J.P. Morgan & Co., Chase Manhattan Corp., Citigroup Inc., Goldman Sachs Group Inc., and Deutsche Bank; and Lawrence H. Summers, former secretary of the treasury, who by law exercised control over the U.S.Exchange Stabilization Fund, subject only to approval by the president.  No legal proceedings like this had ever gone so far against some of the most powerful men and institutions on Wall Street. --- The action against the Bank for International Settlements, the U.S. Federal Reserve and
Treasury Department, and several bullion banks has been brought by a consultant for the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee, GATA, Reginald H. Howe, a private shareholder in the BIS. GATA was formed in January 1999, the same month that the world's leading bullion banks, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan and ten others, joined together to form a 'Counterparty Risk Management Group' to, as they put it, 'strengthen risk management practices'. For six months prior to that, evidence had been mounting that whenever the price of gold threatened to rise above $300 an ounce the bullion banks moved in to knock the price back again, mainly by selling gold borrowed at around 1 percent interest from central banks. --- After the formation of the Counterparty Risk Management Group, the price fixing became more obvious, and it has continued uninterruptedly to the present day, with only one break through the $300 mark, which was quickly suppressed by the gold cartel.  -- The practice has been very profitable for the banks and their principal customers, through what is called the ?gold carry trade?    More importantly, for currency speculators, it had served to underpin the over-valued dollar so useful in the cannibalising of the real economy by the financial sector, i.e., by the transnational bankers, currency and stock exchange speculators and gold
price manipulators.  By "fixing the price of gold" is meant  selling of the Federal Reserve gold stock in exchange for the Federal Reserves own US dollar notes (which the Fed can create at the will) and doing so at below otherwise market dollar-price-of-gold prices --  keeping dollar price low  on the excchanges,  i.e., giving away U.S. economic strength -- gold is permanent value, dollars are mere fiat debt instruments whose value fluctuates with the balance of payments, international debt structure and other voluable economic and political considerations.  In other words they sold gold extra cheap to their friends in international finance.also this amounts to selling the U.S. Central Bank's gold to their friends.
And what ever happened to the gold price fixing case after the first investigation perished withthe North Tower?  Very simple --  the government decided that it was too threatened by terrorism to devote resources to investigating low priority things like that.   Since the attack there has been the  most fundamental reorganization of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in its history, shifting its focus to counterterrorism, that is, to focus on  fighting anti-globalization movements,  and away from crime fighting. Under Attorney General Ashcroft and FBI  Director Robert Mueller III the FBI has given up  responsibility for most of its old legendary duties involving bank robbery and white collar financial crime, including the  gold-price fixing investigation the FBI was conducting in North Tower when the tower and all of the evidence and documentation was destroyed.  (Incidentally, the team of investigators who put Warren Buffet in prison over the S&L scandal also perished on the 24th floor that day.)  Look at these quotations (and between the lines), from the New York Times:
"As counterterrorism becomes the No. 1 priority of the F.B.I., it has become obvious that other types of investigation will have to be de-emphasized at the bureau or turned over to other agencies," said a senior administation official, one of several  interviewed in recent days who have been involved in the discussions.
" Some officials say the restructuring has already begun, even before any formal palns have been proposed, propelled by the terror attacks of September. 11, when thousands of bureau agents across the country were ordered to put aside other investigations to focus exclusively on counterterrorism."
Also in the article:
"...Attorney General  Ashcroft and the bureau's director, Robert S. Mueller III, have agreed that the emphasis on counterterrorism will be permanent and that other major changers are inevitable.  ..."
"...Mr. Mueller, as the bureau's new director.  Mr. Mueller had earned a fearsome reputation from previous jobs, for shaking up government sagncies, notably the United States attorney's office in San Francisco, where he forced out most of the senior managment."  [This during the Clinton years! --  and this is exactly what CLinton's appointee, Louis J. Freeh,  did when he took the job  --  throwing out the top drug fighters from a list he brought with him before he took office  -  these non-political professionals were all demoted and removed within two days -- giving druglords a  very easy time with no seasoned top men running the show--DE].
March 8, 2002  release of 5 security camera video pictures from the Pentagon:
 Someone must be monitoring your site. Today for the first time, The
 Pentagon has felt it had to show pictures of a plane ramming their

 I taped it, as Wolf Blitzer was showing Jamie McIntire's Pentagon
 pictures allegedly taken off a Pentagon camera.

 I put it on slow motion and saw no plane. Not only that, it has been
 'messed' with. It shows clips. It looks like 3 clips. The same pictures,
 or shots with Jamie McIntire were shown next on the Moneyline show. The
 same questions asked with the same answers. Jamie pointing to where
 you're supposed to see a plane coming along the ground about 2 feet
 above the ground before it hits the Pentagon. I have yet to see a plane.
 If there is one, there certainly is not a passenger plane. What it looks
 like to me is a release of material before an explosion. Like the
 pressure couldn't hold it any more and spewed it out. This film must
 have just been doctored for our use. There is no plane in the film.
 There is not even a semblence of a plane. There only remains the lie.
Meanwhile, there was bad news for the drug dealers who may have thought they
got a break when the evidence collected by the federal Drug Enforcement
Administration was buried in the rubble of 6 World Trade Center.
Drugs, Cash Recovered
On Saturday, the feds finally reached the vaults where millions of dollars
worth of powder and crack cocaine, heroin, Ecstasy and other narcotics were
stashed - along with millions in ill-gotten cash.
"They knew it was there and wanted to get it out," said Richard Ricciardi,
45, a heavy-equipment operator for Seasons Construction. "The face of the
building was blown off and they asked us to remove the piles of debris
around it. There were big boxes and bags of evidence."
Lucchese, 40, of the Bronx, said the feds filled a truck with loot and
drugs. "The stuff had DEA evidence tags on it," he said. "They said it was a
DEA vault."
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2001 7:36 PM
Subject: Last Words of Flight Attendent .....

> FYI .... A small item in the many posted notes on the '911' attacks or is
> This reporting of the final words of a flight attendant trying to
> their best firsthand knowledge of a hijacking in progress may be long
> considered in future analysis of these events. Do you wonder too, just who
> was assigned to the seat numbers she read off? >From NG / Original source
> this story was the BBC. Ronn 01/29/01
> ------------------------------
> From:  (zak ah'zuban)
> Date: Sat, Sep 29, 2001 4:10 PM
> Message-id: <>
> BBC reports that a flight attendant
> on board Flight 11, that hit WTC, called
> ground staff in Boston to report hijack
> in progress...only one problem...she
> said there were only 4 hijackers, while
> the FBI said 5, and she called out the
> seat numbers of the 4...those seats
> don't match the seat numbers of the men
> with arabic sounding names who were assigned
> responsibility for the hijack afterwards
> by FBI...?????
> Quote from the BBC:
> "Ms Sweeney's account of the hijacking
> provides unique evidence of what took place
> but it also appears to conflict with previous
> information.
> The FBI has named five hijackers on board
> Flight 11, whereas Ms Sweeney spotted only
> four.
> Also, the seat numbers she gave were
> different from those registered in the hijackers'
> names. " [ end of quote ]
9/11 Pentagon Event: Alleged crash witness James S. Robbins caught in false
account: contradicts Pentagon video when he claims he saw 757 "diving in at
an unrecoverable angle" -- the National-Security Analyst thus implicated in
9/11 mass-murder-frame-up.

Here is ample convicting evidence for the 9/11 frame-up and cover-up.. The
only question is, will people have the nerve ask that it be acted upon. (See

 [By the way an implication of this discovery is the opening of the
possibility that Sharon is not acting from Zionism at all, that Israel's
security  is not his primary interest in his conducting his "war on
Palestinian terrorism"  --  it may be merely a distraction and the agitation
of chaos and violence to provide pretext for a globalist economic war of
conquest (eliciting Arab terrorism throug coercion  --  like kicking a dog
until it bites you )  -- Sharon really working for the investment banking
(Rothschilds etc.) and Big Oil interests in seeking pretexts and the
psychological climate for an aggressive grab of Afgan, Iraqi and Iranian oil
(-as they just tried to grab Venezulan oil in a CIA-planned coup against a
populist government that was using the oil profits to beneift the people
etc.)   --I know this is "out of the blue -- but there is BIG EVIDENCE TO
BACK IT UP --  see the following for that evidence:

Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 8:35 PM
Subject: Pentagon crash witness James S. Robbins caught giving fabrication cover-up account: of 9/11 Pentagon attack-- totally contradicts Pentagon's own video of level approach in claiming he saw 757 "diving in at an unrecoverable angle"

Discredited: James S. ("I-saw-it.") Robbins contradicts Pentagon video when
he claims he saw 757 "diving in at an unrecoverable angle is frozen in my

National-Security Analyst and National Review contributor James S. Robbins
claims that Thierry Meyssan is a "nitwit" for concluding that a Boeing 757
did not hit the Pentagon and does so, he admits, without reading Meyssan's

Yet it is Robbins himself who contradicts other witnesses and the Pentagon
video video when he claims he saw a Boeing 757 "diving in at an
unrecoverable angle is frozen in my memory."  It is not the claim of seeing
a 757 that catches up Robbins, but his claim that he saw it in a dive. The
video shows a horizontal approach and other witnesses claim it was a
"tree-top level appraoch" and a "level appraoch" 20 feet above ground level.
The F-16 that attacked the Pentagon had the ground-contour-hugging
capability to appraoch horizontally and that is why the cover-up lie
requires a "diving" 757.  Robbin's false testimony is as good as a
confession to this investigator.

Also, the account that must be beaten is not  Meyssan's "no-plane" theory,
but the Bosankoe - Eastman discovery from direct replicable observation of
the D.o.D's own hard data, the security video camera which captured the
event.  (See below.)

Enough is now known about the Sept. 11 frame-up attacks in New York and
Washington D.C. to put the cuffs on Bush, Cheney, Kissinger, Rumsfeld,
Wolfowitz, Rice, Gingrich, Pearle and to hold the entire Trilateral
Commission on suspicion.

See if you don't agree after you examin the following evidence.

We knew their motives: 1) The Taliban was erradicating the Norther Alliance
druglord opium that the Triad Chinese use to make the heroin that sells for
$2 trillion a year, the proceeds laundered into U.S. and City of London
investment banks to build slave labor in China; 2) Control of Central Asian
Oil Reserves ($6 trillion total) and the pipeline the and corporation
domination the Taliban would not happen; 3) all the war profiteering that
Rep. Cynthia McKinney (now under attack because they found Moslems who
support Palestinians who contributed to her campaign) has pointed out that
Bush and Cheney-tied firms are to enjoy; 4) totalitarian controls that makes
the ruling CFR syndicate invincible against any populist/progressive (now
labeled pro-terrorist and "for-us-or-against-us traitors;" 5) pretext for
grabbing Iraqi and Iranian oil holdings (as they tried to capture #3  oil
producer Venezuela by US-staged coup d'etat last week) -- to create the
final global oil monopoly; 6) to crush Islam, which is the populism of
Central Asia, North Afric and the Middle East -- their only moral-system
counterbalance to despotism in cultures dominated by tribal hatreds (all
Moslems are brothers, tithe 10 percent to the poor, true equality among men
before God, and anti-usury etc. --  whatever you may think about it).

But now we have proof that the Administration had much more than just "prior
knowledge" of 911.

Read this carefully -- it is information in the race between libertaion and
snuff-out.  Speed it on.

NEW YORK (September 12, 2001) - ...Deputy Secretary of State Paul W. Wolfowitz spoke last week of "ending states who sponsor terrorism." 

Here is the direct visual evidence supplied by the D.o.D. that the
Pentagon was attacked not by a crashbombing Boeing 757, but by
a remotely-controlled  F-16 Falcon that approached horizonally at
20 feet using automatic ground-countour-hugging guidance and, no
more than two seconds before its own impact also fired an air-to-
ground missile into the Pentagon ahead of  its own collision.

Pay close attention to 1) the F-16 silhouette; 2) the white
plume of the missile being fired; 3) the super-white-hot initial blast
characteristic of the high-explosives of a ground to air missile and not
of burning jet or helicopter fuel --

David Bosankoe of the U.K. has enlarged a section
of the clip of the Pentagon attack event taken by
security video camera and released by the Department
of Defense, but he has also gathered other supporting
evidence that you may review at:

In addition, far ranging debate on this topic has been
conducted in the uk.politics.crime Usenet newsgroup,
which you may access at
and typing in uk.politics.crime.

After close examination I am convinced that the
clip does supports neither the official story of a Boeing
757 hitting the building, nor the "French "where's the plane?"
site story that "no plane at all" was involved in the deadly explosions.

It is also significant that the one pilot who claimed to have witnessed
a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon also claimed that the airliner "dived"
into the side of the building --and so by the D.o.D.'s own video
he is discredited.

Here are two letters relevant to this topic, the first dealing with the
Pentagon attack deception and the second in reply to the Atlanta
Journal-Constitution's attack on Rep. Cynthia McKinney's after her call for
an investigation into the events of September 11.

Dick Eastman
223 S. 64th Ave.
Yakima, Washington 98908
(509) 965-4893

> Here is James S. Robbins, National-Security Analyst and National Review
> contributor caught in his lie to the American people and to the world -- his
> lie about the Pentagon attack.  [It is interesting that another
> ultra-conservative publisher, Regnery, also claims to have seen a diving
> 757.  Hmmm.]
> 4-19-2
> Likewise with the Sept. 11 attacks, it is incumbent to remember, and through
> memory to prevent similar events from happening again. The images of the WTC
> attacks speak for themselves. Where video is lacking, as in the case of
> Flight 77 (which is more proof of the plot, says Meyssan) it is up to the
> eyewitnesses to tell their stories.
> So here's mine. I was in my Washington office doing research when one of the
> secretaries told me that an aircraft had hit the World Trade Center. We
> brought the news up on the projection screen in our darkened conference room
> and watched the coverage, seeing endless six-foot high replays of the
> impacts and explosions. It was unsettling, even disorienting, but my
> colleagues and I were appraising it professionally, trading theories on who
> was to blame and how the terrorists coordinated the attacks. We did not come
> to any firm conclusions.
> I went back to my office around 9:20. A short time later a friend of mine
> called, an Air Force officer, and we spoke awhile about the strikes in New
> York. I was standing, looking out my large office window, which faces west
> and from six stories up has a commanding view of the Potomac and the
> Virginia heights. (When I hired on my boss said we had the best view in
> town. True, most days.) The Pentagon is about a mile and half distant in the
> center of the tableau. I was looking directly at it when the aircraft
> struck. The sight of the 757 diving in at an unrecoverable angle is frozen
> in my memory, but at the time, I did not immediately comprehend what I was
> witnessing. There was a silvery flash, an explosion, and a dark, mushroom
> shaped cloud rose over the building. I froze, gaping for a second until the
> sound of the detonation, a sharp pop at that distance, shook me out of it. I
> shouted something both extremely profane and sacrilegious and told my
> friend, "They hit the Pentagon. We're under attack. Gotta go."
> I hung up the phone and turned back to the window to see the dark cloud
> spreading. I yelled down the hall, "Look out the window!" I heard gasps
> outside, and a researcher dashed into my office and stared. I grabbed my
> bags and said I was getting out of the building and invited others to do the
> same. I took the elevator down and walked to the edge of the greensward, in
> easy view of the Pentagon across the river. I set down my bags and stood in
> the dew soaked grass, seeing the brilliant blue sky filling with rolling
> clouds of smoke. The blackness stretched south the length of the horizon.
> The adrenaline of the initial shock had worn off a bit, and I was able to
> take in the enormity of the event. Even more than witnessing the plane
> crash, I remember those long helpless minutes standing in the grass.
> So, of course, I take it personally when a half-wit like Meyssan comes along
> saying it did not happen. And he is so evidently at war with reality that
> one is tempted not to waste time with him. His ideas are obviously foolish,
> easily disproved, an affront to any reasoning person. It would be easy to
> ignore him. But that would be a mistake. This is another front in what
> President Bush called "the war to save civilization itself." The history of
> the 20th century should show that no idea is so absurd that it cannot take
> destructive hold and play havoc with societies, even to the point of
> sanctioning mass murder. Allowing the extremists to go unchallenged only
> encourages them. People like Lenin, Hitler, Pol Pot and other millennial
> criminals were just like Meyssan at one point in their careers. If they had
> been opposed more vigorously sooner, perhaps they never would have attained
> power. When such ideas are allowed to stand, they take root among the
> impressionable or those predisposed to think the worst. And especially now
> that communications technology has made it possible to give global reach to
> the bizarre and archive it forever, it is essential for men and women of
> reason resolutely to counter the delusions of the fringe element.
> I was there. I saw it.
--Dick Eastman
A final item:
On November 18, 1998 populist Patrick Buchanan
addressed the Council of Foreign Relations in Chicago:

" To the new corporate elite, putting America first
betrays a lack of loyalty to the company. Some
among our political elite share this view. Here is
Strobe Talbott, Clinton's roommate at Oxford
and architect of his Russian policy: "All countries,"
said Talbott in 1991, "are basically social
arrangements...No matter how permanent and
even sacred they may seem at any one time, in
fact they are all artificial and temporary...within
the next hundred years...nationhood as we know
it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single,
global authority".... This is the transnational elite,
our new Masters of the Universe."
(Go, Pat, Go!  -- Dick Eastman)
Another Amazing Discovery  -- this news I  posted days prior to 9-11:
From: "Dick Eastman" <>
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2001 11:33 AM
Subject: Re: "Israel appears to be on a countdown"
Now a new and wholly independent source no reasonable man
can ignore, corroboration of the Strafor Intelligence Report
(the last posting to this thread.)  See Dr. Bearden's article below.

"Dick Eastman" <> wrote in message news:...
> I forward this praying that hardened hearts will be softened
> and the dignity and infinite value of all men that is far above
> the goals of petty nationalisms, ethnic chauvenism and narrow
> (and wrongly reckoned) self-interest, will prevail as it has not
> in the bitter past.

Two billion people may die in next Middle-East-ignited
world war, a war already detected to be in motion.
This is the war that will reach American and European
shores, and will spread around the world.

Bearden, Thomas E. Ph.D., nuclear engineer, retired Lieutenant
Colonel (U.S. Army), CEO of CTEC, Inc., Director of the
Association of Distinguished American Scientists, and Fellow
Emeritus of the Alpha Foundation's Institute for Advanced Study.
Tom is a theoretical conceptualist active in the study of scalar
electromagnetics, advanced electrodynamics, unified field theory,
KGB energetics weapons and phenomena, free energy systems,
electromagnetic healing via the unified field action of extended
Sachs-Evans electrodynamics, and human development. Particularly
known for his work establishing a theory of overunity electrical
power systems, scalar electromagnetic weapons, energetics weapons,
and the use of time-as-energy in both power systems and the
mind-body interaction.
U.S. - Syria
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 22:24:54 -0500


Looks as if the maneuverings for war preparation in the MidEast
are beginning.  It doesn't take a genius to see that war in the
MidEast is now very highly probable, and that this is an optimum
time for our adversaries because of the drawdown of U.S. forces
below the level required to do this thing.  We are as vulnerable
right now as we are ever likely to be.  Also, we are almost
certainly going to be involved in it; there is simply no way out
of it.  In this brief article, you get a glimpse of the kind of
options the administration must be worrying over at present.

With another MidEast War, two things come prominently to mind: (1)
the terrorist teams, anthrax, smallpox, and nuclear weapons
already spirited into this country and waiting to be unleashed in
our large cities, may well be unleashed to the tune of some
millions of U.S. casualties and extraordinary damage, and (2) a
new energy and oil crisis that will curl your hair will be come
roaring down on us.  We will likely not get out of this one
unscathed, but probably will suffer terrible damage.

Lunev is the highest ranking GRU defector we ever had.  Read his
book (cleared by the CIA), and he will explain to you how the
Russians brought in large nuclear weapons to the U.S., with their
Spetnatz teams already in place to set them off.  These are not
the little "suitcase" munitions, but weapons larger than those
dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in WW II. Several nations --
Iran, Iraq, etc. -- have also spirited in trainged, professional
terrorist teams and weapons of mass destruction such as anthrax
and smallpox.  Read "Viewpoint", by former Senator Sam Nunn, in
Aviation Week & Space Technology, Aug. 13, 2001, p. 74, or visit
their website at  There you will get a
glimpse of how totally unprepared we are, for what may be coming
down upon our cities in the near future.  Smallpox alone, if
unleashed again, will kill nearly two billion people on earth, or
about one-third of the Earth's population [Laurie Garrett, "The
Nightmare of Bioterrorism," Foreign Affairs, 80(1), Jan./Feb.
2001, p. 76-89.  Quoting p. 77: " Were a terrorist to disperse the
smallpox virus, for example, populations that were once
universally vaccinated would now be horribly vulnerable.  Today
the U.S. government stows only about 15.4 million doses of the
smallpox vaccine-enough for less than seven percent of the
American population.  The World Health Organization (WHO) keeps
another 500,000 doses in the Netherlands, and other national
stockpiles total about 60 million more doses of varying quality
and potency.  If the smallpox virus were released today, the
majority of the world's population would be defenseless, and given
the virus' 30 percent kill rate, nearly two billion people would

I can assure you that, if Saddam Hussein unleashes such a
holocaust on American cities, the U.S. will strike Iraq with a
full nuclear retaliation strike, and bury him.  What happens then
is anybody's guess.

Here's another thing that our news did not even pick up on.
Earthquakes, volcano eruptions, etc. are in fact being tested all
the time against us, and could be unleashed wholesale at any time.
This was verified by none other that then Secretary of Defense
William S. Cohen, during a public Q&A session at an April 1997
counterterrorism conference sponsored by former Senator Sam Nunn,
i.e., Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and
U.S. Strategy, University of Georgia, Athens, Apr. 28, 1997.
Quoting from the official DoD News Briefing:  "Others [terrorists]
are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can
alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through
the use of electromagnetic waves... So there are plenty of
ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which
they can wreak terror upon other nations...It's real, and that's
the reason why we have to intensify our [counterterrorism]
efforts." Secretary of Defense William Cohen at an April 1997
counterterrorism conference sponsored by former Senator Sam Nunn.
Quoted from DoD News Briefing, Secretary of Defense William S.
Cohen, Q&A at the Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass
Destruction, and U.S. Strategy, University of Georgia, Athens,
Apr. 28, 1997.

And just to keep it interesting, Castro for some decades has run
guerrilla training camps in Southern Mexico, and infiltrated much
of the output as trained saboteurs and guerrillas, across the Rio
Grande, already here among our midst.  Their job will be to take
out key bridges, power stations and power lines, etc. --
destroying a great deal of the power grid.  Estimates of the
numbers vary, but it is safe to assume about 5,000 here.  Many of
the hostile Arab countries already have a substantial number of
graduate students and students -- a percentage of which are
terrorist agents -- here in the U.S. also, biding their time.  And
our State Department doesn't even know where they all are, or keep
up with them.

You see, modern strategic war has changed drastically.  Now it
will be fought right in the heart of our cities, against our
civilian population, not just our soldiers on some distant
battlefield.  The public is ill-informed and totally unprepared.
There are no shelters, much less ones with biological insulation
against penetration of aerosols, etc.  There are nowhere nearly
enough medical installations or personnel.  There is a laughable
amount of old smallpox vaccine, much of which is no longer fit to
be used on humans.  The newer strain of smallpox made by the
Russians and clandestinely sold to the terrorist groups is not
affected by the vaccine anyway.  The only way to decontaminate a
large city struck by a professional release of anthrax (100
kilograms of anthrax spores sprayed out of a little piper cub type
aircraft on a calm night) is by special very harsh sprays that
have been developed in secret (they are not classified, but are
clandestine -- that's what all the mysterious "spraying" around
the nation for more than a year has been all about).  The spray
will kill the anthrax spores, including in your lungs if you
breath it and the spores in.  But it will also kill many people
who have respiratory problems, are feeble and old, are little
children, etc.  The terrible thing about the "new war" is that now
the military commanders have to make decisions with the lives of
the civil populace that used to only be made for an army in the
field. An army commander may have to send two divisions to their
death (30,000 men) to stem an enemy advance and save the rest of
his army. Now he may have to order a spraying that will kill
25,000 U.S. civilians, but may save 15 million.

And once one shows symptoms of anthrax, there is really little
that can be done about it.  With the shortage of facilities, large
numbers of casualties, shortage of antibiotics etc., triage will
apply.  Simply put, that means that anyone showing symptoms will
probably just be laid aside to die.  The treatment will of
necessity be reserved for those for whom it may succeed.  In
short, the most likely to respond and survive are the ones who
will be treated first, not those who are most desperately ill and
most likely to die.

As the Chinese say, we do live in "interesting" times.  This is
the real world we live in, not the one that one reads about in the
daily news.

Best wishes,



Aviation Week & Space Technology

13 August 2001

Biological Threat to U.S. Homeland is 'Very Real'

By Sam Nunn

A terrorist germ attack on U.S. soil would mock all past defense
strategies, says former U.S. Sen. Sam Nunn, who was "President" in
a recent bio-warfare simulation of a smallpox crisis that began in
Oklahoma City. At a recent congressional hearing, he summarized
lessons learned from the simulation, called "Dark Winter."


We have effectively only 12 million doses of smallpox vaccine in
America to protect a population of 275 million that is not highly
vaccinated and is therefore highly vulnerable.

Our [simulation] began with 20 confirmed "cases" in Oklahoma City;
30 suspected cases spread out in Oklahoma, Georgia and
Pennsylvania, and [there were] countless more cases of individuals
who were infected, but didn't know it.

The effects of a bomb are bounded in time and place. After the
explosion, the nation's leadership knows if you're injured, and
the extent of the damage.

Smallpox, on the other hand, is a silent, ongoing, invisible
attack. It is highly contagious and spreads in a flash--each
smallpox victim can infect 10-20 others. Because it incubates for
two weeks, it comes in waves.

The most insidious effect of a biological weapons attack is that
it could turn Americans against Americans. Once smallpox is
released, it is not the terrorists anymore who are the threat;
your neighbors and your family members can become the threat, and
can even become the enemy.

For more than 2,000 years, the first rule of war has been to know
your enemy. You estimate the number of tanks and planes and troops
of the enemy, their intelligence capabilities [and] other

But in this case, the order of battle would be our own people,
traveling, engaging in commerce, spreading the disease. You don't
know who initially released [the virus], how much more [germ
agent] they have, or where they are. The usual responses to attack
are impossible: "Engage the enemy, open fire, stop the advance,
bring out the wounded." You can hardly know who is wounded.

Since smallpox has not been seen in the U.S. since 1949, very few
health care professionals would recognize the virus. Initial cases
could be sent back home infectious, even after appearing at
doctors' offices or emergency rooms. Laboratory facilities needed
to diagnose the disease are inadequate and out of date.

Hospitals run at capacity all the time; a surge in patients from
smallpox, combined with the inevitable infections of hospital
personnel and the flight of some fearful health care
professionals, would create a catastrophic overload.

We have 12 million doses of vaccine, enough for one in every 23
Americans. Whom do we decide to vaccinate?

Do you seize hotels and convert them into hospitals? Do you close
borders and stop all travel?

What level of force do you use to keep someone sick in isolation?
Do you keep people known, or thought to be exposed, quarantined in
their homes? Do you guarantee 2.5-million doses of vaccine to the

How do you talk to the public in a way that is candid, yet
prevents panic--knowing that panic itself can be a weapon of mass

Naturally, there are some skeptics anytime you describe a dire
threat to the U.S. I want to tell you: I am convinced the threat
of a biological weapons attack on the U.S. is very real. An
experiment some years ago showed that a scientist whose specialty
was in another field was able to weaponize anthrax on his first
attempt, for less than $250,000. Hundreds of labs and repositories
around the world sell biological agents for legitimate research.

We need to focus more attention, concern and resources on the
specific threat of bioterrorism. We are considering ways to
improve infectious disease surveillance around the globe,
including rapid detection [through state-of-the-art sensors],
investigation and a fast and effective response.

The national pharmaceutical stockpile should be built to capacity
as soon as possible, and then dispersed to different sites, which
must be secured. We don't want to fall victim to a twin attack
that releases a bio-agent and simultaneously blows up all our
drugs and vaccines.

Officials at the highest level of the federal government--and at
state and local levels--need to participate in exercises like Dark
Winter to understand the importance of advance preparation.
Theater professionals rehearse for months before the real [event].
This is one case where life had better imitate art--for the sake
of life itself.

Copyright 2001 c All Rights Reserved.

And this monster fact:

Army general and head of the PGR releases two Israelis arrested with guns and explosives inside the Mexican Congress

Ernesto Cienfuegos
La Voz de Aztlan

Los Angeles, Alta California - October 15, 2001- (ACN) In a mind-blowing development, La Voz de Aztlan has learned that Mexican Army General Rafael Marcial Macedo de la Concha who heads the Procuraduría General de la República (Mexican Department of Justice) has released the retired Israeli Defense Forces colonel and presumed MOSSAD agent Salvador Guersson Smecke and Israeli illegal immigrant Saur Ben Zvi after both had penetrated the security of the Mexican Congress and where in possession of guns, hand grenades and explosives.

This morning La Voz de Aztlan had a personal telephone interview with the Mexican Congressional Press Secretary, Lic. Adriana Lopez, and verified the arrest of the two Israelis after they had entered through the highly secured front entrance of the Palacio Legislativo de San Lázaro. She stated to La Voz de Aztlan that the two terrorists had taken advantage of a situation that occurred around 1700 hours of Wednesday October 10 when a large contingent of Sugar Industry Unionists were entering through the metal detectors. The two Israelis followed about 50 of the unionists to the office of the President of the Mexican Congress Beatriz Paredes. The two Israelis were first pretending to be press photographers but called the attention of the sugar unionists because of their nervous and out of the ordinary behavior. About ten of the unionists confronted them and observed that they were carrying guns and and what looked to them to be explosives. They held the two Israelis until Official Congressional Security personnel took them into custody. The head of Congressional Security Salvador Alarcón verified that the Israelis had in their possession nine hand grenades, sticks of dynamite, detonators, wiring and two 9mm "Glock" automatics.

Mexican Congressional Press Secretary Lic. Adriana Lopez informed La Voz de Aztlan in the telephone interview that Congressional Security then turned the terrorists Salvador Guersson Smecke, age 34, and Saur Ben Zvi, age 27, to the Procuraduría General de la República (Mexican Department of Justice) which is headed by Mexican Army General Rafael Marcial Macedo de la Concha. Initial reports by the Procuraduría General de la República (PGR) were that both Israelis worked for a private security agency and that they both had gun permits. It turned out that there is no connection of either suspect to any private security agency. The PGR has released the retired Israeli I.D.F. colonel with the official explanation that he had a legal permit to carry a gun. They also released the illegal Israeli immigrant on about $4000 bail and the case turned over to the Mexican immigration authorities. Mexican Congressional Press Secretary Lic. Adriana Lopez was surprised to hear from La Voz de Aztlan of the release of the two Israelis.

La Voz de Aztlan has also learned that the Israeli Embassy used heavy handed measures to have the two Israelis released. Very high level emergency meetings took place between Mexican Secretary of Foreign Relations Jorge Gutman, General Macedo de la Concha and a top Ariel Sharon envoy who flew to Mexico City specially for that purpose. Elías Luf of the Israeli Embassy worked night and day and their official spokeswoman Hila Engelhart went into high gear after may hours of complete silence. What went one during those high levels meetings no ones knows, but many in Mexico are in disbelief at their release. Guns and any kind of explosive is highly illegal for Mexican citizens and the fact that these two Israelis had them inside the Mexican Congress makes their release highly suspect. What is really going on? Jorge Gutman, the Mexican Foreign Secretary, has very strong Zionist connections and himself is of Jewish descent. Mexican Army General Macedo de la Concha has strong connections to the U.S. Military Industrial-Complex and through this to the Israeli Defense Forces. Have any of these connections influenced the decision to release the two Zionist terrorists?

The initial arrests of the two Israelis inside the Palacio Legislativo de San Lázaro made top news on Mexico City television and radio on the evening of October 10. TV Azteca had extensive coverage on the first night and on the following day. La Cronica de Hoy Newspaper and El Universal Newspaper both covered the incident the following two days but now it seems that there is a lack of reports. The PGR has a Press Bulletin on their official website at but they have made no updates. No U.S. media has made any mention, that we know, except one by this Sunday at: Pravda of Moscow has a note of the initial La Voz de Aztlan article at:

What were the Israelis up to? We think we know. The Vicente Fox government has been very careful of involving Mexico in a war against Islam. The Mexican population as well as the two major opposition political parties, the PRI and the PRD will not allow it. President Bush and the U.S. Zionists want Mexico fully involved in the war principally because if things get tough in the middle east and the oil rich Arabs leave the coalition, the U.S. military machine is going to need alternative sources of oil and PEMEX is just across the border. We believe that the two Zionists terrorist were going to blow up the Mexican Congress. The second phase was to mobilize both the Mexican and US press to blame Osama bin Laden. Most likely then Mexico would declare war on Afghanistan as well, commit troops and all the oil it could spare to combat Islamic terrorism.


Sharon and Putin  on September 6, 2001!

Mr. Eastman,

Sorry for the early call this morning.  The following is a Washington Post
article I pulled out of their Archives.  Also, remember the Russian
passenger plane explosion a few days after 9/11?  Guess who was on board.
Thanks again for your work.


"Parallel Propaganda"

by Jackson Diehl
October 15, 2001; Page A19
Six days before Sept. 11, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and Russian
President Vladimir Putin -- the leaders of two countries that never used to
get along -- met in Moscow and found one strong area of agreement: "the
danger," as Sharon put it, "of fundamentalist, extremist Islamic terror." It
was the beginning of what is becoming a beautiful friendship -- and one of
the most dangerous points of weakness within the U.S. counterterrorist

With their handshake in the Kremlin, Sharon and Putin exchanged a common
falsehood about the wars their armies are fighting against rebels in
Chechnya and the West Bank and Gaza. In both cases, the underlying conflict
is about national self-determination: statehood for the Palestinians,
self-rule for Chechnya. The world is inclined to agree that both causes are
just. But mixed among the insurgents in both places are Islamic extremists,
including some who share the ideology and methods or even the funding of
Osama bin Laden. Sharon and Putin both have tried to convince the world that
all of their opponents are terrorists, which implies that the solution need
not involve political concessions but merely a vigorous counterterrorism

Before Sept. 11 their parallel propaganda may not have been persuasive even with each other. But in the past five weeks, the two have been emboldened to believe that they can force the world to accept a new understanding of the Chechens and Palestinians -- and though the logic is no better than before, the power of Sept. 11 is working for them. Last week President Bush again agreed that al Qaeda was operating in Chechnya and that its fighters there should be "brought to justice"; meanwhile, bin Laden did Sharon a favor by trumpeting the cause of the Palestinians, forcing Yasser Arafat to open fire on pro-bin Laden demonstrators in Gaza.

In one sense the events of Sept. 11 created an opportunity to break what have been dismal and bloody stalemates in both Chechnya and the Palestinian
territories. Since neither the Chechen rebel government of Aslan Maskhadov
nor Arafat's Palestinian authority really is pro-bin Laden -- and in fact
both have long been under threat themselves from the Islamic extremists --
there is a chance to split them off from the terrorists. That would both
weaken bin Laden's organization and make possible a peaceful settlement with
the nationalists -- a double blow to the Islamic extremist cause. The Bush
administration has tried to do just that, pressuring both Arafat and
Maskhadov to make a clean break with the terrorists, while urging Putin and
Sharon to open political negotiations.

Arafat and Maskhadov, who have made use of the terrorists against a common
national enemy, have responded ambiguously. But it's meanwhile become clear
that neither Putin nor Sharon wants a political settlement. Each has a
different set of war goals: Putin would like to crush Maskhadov's Chechen
independence movement once and for all, and force Chechens to accept the
puppet administration he has installed in the republic's ruins. Similarly,
Sharon dreams of destroying Arafat's Palestinian Authority, an act that
would allow him to begin imposing his own long-cherished vision of a West
Bank dominated by a grid of Israeli territorial holdings, with the
Palestinians squeezed into weak, disconnected cantons.

So both Sharon and Putin have gone through the motions of talks-about-talks
with Arafat and Maskhadov in the past two weeks, while making sure that
nothing comes of it. Putin has set impossible conditions, demanding that the
Chechens surrender and disarm before any negotiations begin. Sharon
similarly demands periods of "quiet" before any talks or confidence-building
measures, but repeatedly breaks the peace himself with invasions of
Palestinian territory. Both meanwhile trumpet their offers of intelligence
and logistical support to U.S. forces in Central Asia, hoping that such
contributions, and their strident anti-terrorist rhetoric, will overshadow
their quiet obstinacy.

It will be tempting to go along with them. Why bother with Chechnya or the Palestinians while the war against al Qaeda is going on? But there is a real danger: The national grievances of the Palestinians and Chechens, though not the cause of Islamic extremism, offer a political bridge between the terrorists and a significant sector of mainstream society in Muslim countries. The two wars and their atrocities are featured on the recruitment videos that al Qaeda circulates. Just as ending them would rob the terrorists of vital oxygen, the failure to do so will make it harder to root them out.

Even worse would be the realization of the Putin-Sharon program -- the
crushing of legitimate Muslim national aspirations under the guise of
counterterrorism. If the U.S. alliance allows itself to be tied or tarred
with that strategy, there will be no hope of victory.

One last last item:
From: "Dick Eastman" <>
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 10:32 PM
Subject: FEMA agent spills the beans; Nationality of the five accomplices held in Germany
About two weeks ago we heard that several suspects were arrested in Germany
linked to the 9/11 attacks, but they would not release their nationality or
details.  Now a German official has said that the reason they still have not released
the nationality of the suspects is that it is "too hot."

To me this raises the suspicion that they are Americans or Israelis -- or, at least,
not Afgan terrror shepherds pretending to be on vacation -- otherwise, why
the big deal?

Like I say,  Congress and President know they are murdering innocent people, yet they do it anyway  for money and to save face  --  and they are perfectly content to let the real mass murderers get off scott free -- and in fact probably profit by hundreds of billions of dollars in oil and
laundered-northern-alliance-opium-drug money.

Now that we know it is a frame-up we can go back and see who held the
necessary strategic postion to blind Uncle Sam and who also was
ready with the exploitive "spin" instantly in play.  How about that old
San Francisco Trotskyite, Dian Feinstein (whose husband's business does
large business deals with China's PLA.):


WASHINGTON - 09.11.01 | "In my view, this is an act of war against the
United States. I join the President and the Congressional leadership in
declaring our resolute determination to respond to this horrific attack on
our nation. Any country or other entity who would harbor the terrorists
responsible for this tragedy is an enemy of the United States and we must
respond militarily. Today is a dark day in our nation's history. I urge all
Americans to come together with a sense of unity and purpose. We cannot
countenance such actions against the United States. To the loved ones of
those who have been killed or injured I extend my deepest sympathy. Their
deaths must not be in vain. As chair of the Terrorism and Technology
Committee, I am also convinced that the need for homeland defense and
homeland security must be our nation's number one priority."


Our criminal mass-murdering elites better start adding atomic
bombs to their frame-up  --  the anthrax simply isn't a good
enough distraction from quilt so glaringly obvious.

Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
Every man is responsible to every other man.
"We need honest, reasoned debate, not fear mongering," Ashcroft said. "To
those who scare peace-loving people with phantoms of lost liberty, my
message is this: Your tactics only aid terrorists, for they erode our
national unity and diminish our resolve. They give ammunition to America's
enemies and pause to America's friends." -- Attorney General John Ashcroft
Dec 2001
"Show me that age and country where the rights and liberties of the people
were placed on the sole chance of their rulers being good men without a
consequent loss of liberty! I say that the loss of that dearest privilege
has ever followed, with absolute  certainty, every such mad attempt."
  -- Patrick Henry
In questions of power...let no more be heard of confidence in man, but
bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution." 
"Experience [has] shown that, even under the best forms [of government],
those entrusted with power have, in time and by slow operations, perverted
it into tyranny."
  -- Jefferson
"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who
approaches that jewel.  Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but
downright  force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined."
  --Patrick Henry

Damn!  One more:
I'm talking about Iran-Contra. During this period, "former" Mossad
officers Michael Harari and Amiram Nir worked with the White House
and CIA to smuggle cocaine into the U.S. through Central America.
 In the process, they gave the Mossad everything they would ever
need to personally blackmail every U.S. President since that time.
 George H. W. Bush helped run the operation and Bill Clinton
 participated as governor of Arkansas, where much of the import
 operations took place. I could name lesser officials who were involved,
 but the point is already made. Israel and the U.S. have been
bedmates and business partners in the cocaine trade for a long time.
Anyone who denies the foregoing facts after examining all available
evidence is either a liar or a fool. Vince Foster is also thought to be
both the beneficiary and victim of the Mossad. Forbes magazine
was pursuing the story in 1995, but eventually backed off. Forbes'
Senior Editor at the time wrote the following letter to the
White House Press Secretary:

 "Dear Mr. McCurry:
 "Forbes Magazine is preparing an article for immediate publication.
We would like to offer the White House an opportunity to comment
on the following assertions.

 "1.) That Vincent W. Foster, while White House Deputy Counsel,
 maintained a Swiss bank account.

 "2.) That funds were paid into that account by a foreign government,
 specifically the State of Israel.

 "3.) That shortly before his death and coincident with the onset of
 severe and acute depression, Vincent Foster learned he was under
investigation by the CIA for espionage.

 "4.) That this information was made available to him by Hillary Rodham

 "5.) That while he was White House Deputy Counsel and for
many years prior, Vincent Foster had been a behind-the- scenes
control person on behalf of the National Security Agency for
Systematics, a bank data processing company integrally involved
in a highly secret intelligence effort to monitor world bank

 "6.) That Systematics was also involved in 'laundering' funds
from covert operations, including drug and arms sales related
to activities in and around Mena, Ark.

 "7.) That through Systematics' relationship with E-Systems,
Vincent Foster may have had access to highly sensitive code,
encryption and data security information of strategic importance.

 "8.) That both prior to and after his death, documents relating to
 Systematics were removed from Vincent Foster's office in the White

 "9.) That the meeting at the Cardozo (Landau) estate on the eastern
 shore of Maryland on the weekend before Vincent Foster's death
was attended by, among others, George Stephanopolous.

 "10.) That Hillary Rodham Clinton was also a beneficiary of funds from
 Foster's Swiss account.

 "Thank you very much for your prompt attention to this matter. Please
 fax your written response before end-of-business Tuesday, April 18, to
 Forbes at 212-620-2417. If you have questions, please call me at
212-620-2215. "Respectfully yours,

 "James R. Norman, Senior Editor"