THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT SINGLE 9-11 DOCUMENT IN
EXISTENCE
THE PROOF OF MOSSAD COMPLICITY IN 9-11 IS ESTABLISHED
-- THE EVIDENCE SUPPLIED -- FORGOTTEN NEWS ITEMS PRE- AND IMMEDIATELY
POST- 9-11 FITTED INTO THE COMPLETED PICTURE -- ISRAEL WAS
INVOLVED -- IT IS TIME TO MOVE ON ISRAEL AND ZIONISM WORLD
WIDE.
DICK EASTMAN
223 S. 64TH AVE
YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
___________________________________
"I see in the near future a crisis
approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my
country. ... corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high
places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavour to prolong
its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is
aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed." -- A.
Lincoln
____________________________________
"The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the
people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger
than their democratic State itself. That, in its essence, is Fascism ? ownership
of government by an individual, by a group or by any controlling private
power." -- Franklin D. Roosevelt
____________________________________
(After staying three months at Bernard
Baruch's Hobcow Plantation in North Carolinia without a phone (in 1944 during
World War II !!!), Roosevelt's health recovered briefly just long enough for him
to win re-election, afterwhich he soon unexpectedly died (the
people never suspected and could not imagine how he could have seemed so healthy
during the campaign etc. -- note that Baruch was also close to Woodrow
Wilson, whose Presidency was run by his new sexy wife (his first wife
suddenly died the week the U.S. entered World War I in 1917) when he was a
helpless invalid -- and yes, earlier, Wilson's health did recover briefly
for a re-election run in 1916 under the disingenuous slogan "He kept
us out of war." )
"It is from numberless diverse acts
of courage and belief that human history is shaped. Each time a person stands up
for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against
injustice, s/he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing each other from
a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a current
which can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and
resistance." -- Robert Kennedy (JFK's brother and Attorney
General whom the Oligarchy also feared)
"9-11 the day Sharon moved Americans to kill
Arabs"
Notes on a telephone coversation by Dick
Eastman
"The war against terrorism cannot end before
Saddam Hussein is out of power in Iraq"
--
Senator Joseph Lieberman, Fox News
Sunday, December, 2001 (Tony Snow then asked: "Are you sure it is because all the Iraqis are
'terrorists,' Senator?)
____________________________________
I just got off the phone with Mark Bilk. In our conversation --
prompted by my reading him the subject heading of this message which I had just
begun to write when he phoned -- we made some important deductions that, as far
as I know, have never been made explicit. Let me just share with you my
post-call notes as I write them.
Mark objected to naming Sharon because their was
not direct proof of his involvement, although, he added, it has just come to
light that the owner of the WTC, Silverstein, has just been discovered to have
close personal ties with Ariel Sharon. Mark argued that we know that
Sharon had to have known the frame-up was coming, but that his instrumental role
can not yet been proven.
I responded by saying that, while a disinformation
heckler tomato-throwing operative would never accept the logic, that, in fact,
any reasonable person with all of the relevant facts, can be certain that Sharon
and Mossad had to have been actively involved in the entire operation from the
outset. The reasoning behind this statement is as follows.
We know by the fact that the Boeing did not crash
at the Pentagon and that the building was hit by a smaller aircraft which fired
at least one missile into the building ahead of its own penetration of the first
floor, that such an operation, with standdowns and coverup, had to have involved
the top leadership at the Pentagon. This means that Rumsfeld and Paul
Wolfwitz had to have been involved. And if Wolfowitz was involved, this
very high-power advisory group consisting of Richard Perle, Henry Kissinger,
Newt Gingrich who were working out of the Pentagon had to have been privy to the
plan -- one cannot imagine Rumsfeld and/or Wolfowitz planning the attack on the
Pentagon with the aid of some other party and not letting these powerful men in
on the secret. The very notion that these important men -- Perle
representing the Rothschilds and Kissinger representing China and the
Rockefellers and Gingrich, also a self-proclaimed Rockefeller asset -- would be
serving on a committee of the assistant secretary of defense, indicates that
even before 9-11 the Pentagon was where the most important operations of the
Bush administration were being planned. (This is not to say that Cheney is not
intimate with this conspiracy as well, but only that the direct evidence points
most unequivocally at the Pentagon leadership.)
Now follow this reasoning closely.
Given that the evidence in the Pentagon attack
implicates Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle, Kissinger and Gingrich (and other,
smaller fry) we must then ask -- would these men plan a black-op
mass-murder frame-up without the involvement of the CIA (and of course
other agencies like the FBI and the FAA etc.), remembering both the
air-interception standdown, the intelligence standdown, and various coverups
(like the 97 Israelis who were illegally working with illegal top security
passes at both Dulles International Airport (in D.C., where Flight 77 took
off from) and Reagan National (where the Boeing which witnesses saw at the
Pentagon, presumably Flight 77, must have landed following its overflight of the
just-hit building) -- that these Israeli's where, months later these
identified Isralei infiltrators (did zealous people at the airport detect all of
the foreigners in high-security positions and report it?) who were briefly
detained, were all subsequently deported by Ashcroft back to Israel with the
most minimal back page coverage by the American media -- but only after
Reagan National (where "77" landed) became the last of all airports to re-open
(after the aircraft was either taken apart like a hot stolen car or else given
new "livery" and numbers in the hanger to which it taxied when it set down on
9-11-01.) SO we have Israelis who obtained illegal-for-them
top-security-clearance badges at the two most politically sensitive and
espionage-aware airports in the United States, Reagan's runway #15
being only one mile from location of the Pentagon crash. And we have them,
like the Israelis who photographed the imploding WTC towers with laughter on
their lips -- who told Israeli radio after they also had been deported, that
they were sent to witness the event.(!) (Remember also how phone calls
were made to the WTC to persons whose first phonecall out after getting this
information was to Israeli intelligence and not to the WTC security people or to
U.S. authorities. Remember too that very few Israeli's died and very few
Jews -- the building held 70,000 workers and visitors on a typical day, whereas
fewer than 3,000 people died at the Pentagon that day and none of those top
CEO's from any banking or world trade firm -- although the data on this
last point has been sketchy.) So we must assume that Mossad and Sharon
must have known about the attack.
But we can say more with confidence in our
reliability and validity, that Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz -- two men directly
implicated by the Pentagon false-flag attack proof -- were involved with the
help of the CIA and that since the CIA is known to work intimately with Mossad
in all operations (for example the CIA had no agents in the field in Central
Asia (including Afganistan) at the time of 9-11 and received all of their
in-the-field intelligence from from Mossad at this time) -- as I was
saying, we know that the CIA works with Mossad on all of the most important
operations; and too we know that Mossad actually infiltrates all branches of the
Federal government, including the CIA, so that the CIA could not be engaged in a
black-op like the 9-11 frame-up without Mossad being aware of it -- which we
know (from events surrounding the WTC attack) that they were informed --
we must now ask ourselves the following question:
Would a team of
Rumsfeld-Wolfowitz-Perle-Gingrich-Myers etc. have have planned 9-11 without
first asking if such an operation would be OK with Israel?? In other
words, would not these pro-Israel Zionists not have asked Israel to sign
off on the plan to make sure that Israel would not be adversly affected by the
"frame-op" -- in other words Israel would have had to have "signed off" on 9-11,
at the very least, signalling Rumsfeld-Wolfowitz-Perle-Gingrich-Myers that it
was OK (beneficial to Sharon's and Mossad's view of the good of Israel, or at
least not harmful to their interests) to proceed with the false-flag
inside-job.
Now we must ask this:
Is it imaginable that Sharon and Mossad would then
say to Rumsfeld-Wolfowitz-Perle-Gingrich-Myers -- you may proceed with
this unethical operation if you wish, but be informed that Israel is a highly
ethical country and we will not soil our hands by becoming involved in so
unbecoming an enterprise, so don't ask for our help or the help of those
infiltrated 97 agents of ours at Reagan National and Dulles, OK?"
No. This could not have been Sharon's and
Mossad's position on 9-11 -- rather they had to be involved every step of
the way -- the entire Pentagon was not complict in the conspiracy
(remember it was the office of Naval Intelligence, which has always been
independent from the CIA who were all murdered by the first-floor penetration of
missile and jet fighter in the newly renovated section of the Pentagon, where
only Naval Intelligence and a few others (targets?) had been moved
in!) as I was saying, the entire Pentagon personel were definitely
not complicit -- there were several lower in the organizational pyrimid who had
to be kept from suspecting what was being planned -- and so much of the work had
to have been conducted outside the US, and certainly not in some cave in
Afganistan or some underground nuclear-chemical facility of Saddam
Hussein. The CIA had to have been involved, and that iteself buys Mossad
cooperation and involvement. And the Pentagon Zionist's proven to be
complicit by the Pentagon attack evidence, could not possibly have proceeded
with the 9-11 opeation without sign-off by Sharon and others in
Israel.
ANd I should add, which I did not discuss with
Mark, but which has just occured to me to add -- Perle represents the
Rothchild interests in the US (as Bernard Baruch did in the period from 1911 to
1956), which means that the City of London (London's Wall Street) was also
involved and its invisible intelligence arm, MI6, (the British counterpart to
the CIA) also had to be involved simply because of the intimate "special
relationship" between British and American and Israeli intelligence serivces,
the relationship among their financial establishments, and the family ties among
the respective ruling financial, corporate, military and foreign affairs
elites of the U.S. and the U.K.
So yes, the Pentagon evidence (see below) clinches
everthing.
Thanks Mark, I think we worked it all out
together -- no new pieces have been introduced here -- everything is
established fact, old news -- but we have fitted it together properly for
the first time, we have made an important deduction that no one had yet made
explicit -- although I am sure this reasoning has gone through the minds of most
informed and intelligent investigators who are not working for the
coverup.
So yes -- I can say it with confidence
"9-11 was the day Sharon moved Americans to kill Arabs" --
now what were all you discussants saying about
First Lieutenant George Bush's military record of 35 years ago versus that of
his Bonesman mate and fellow Zionist warhawk, John Kerry -- don;t let my
trivial ramblings disturb your important discussion.
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
Every man is responsible to every other
man.
___________________________________
What happened to Flight 77? After a showy higher altitude approach to
the Pentagon as the F-16 flew in at tree-top level for the actual kill -- Flight
77 simply crossed the Jefferson Davis Highway across the part to the George
Washington Memorial Parkway to Reagon National Airport on the Potomac -- less
than two miles from the attack point -- where it landed and taxied to an
undisclosed hanger where it was met by some of the 100 persons, many with
criminal records and foreign citizenship, who obtained false airport security
badges credentials giving them free access to sensitive airport areas, like
ramps, gates, hangers and aircraft.
Details:
http://www.humanunderground.com/11september/pent.htmlAlso
Reuters:
"More than 70 have been deported or are awaiting
deportation proceedings, authorities said."WASHINGTON (Reuters) - More than 100 employees at two major
Washington area airports have been arrested on fraud charges in obtaining
restricted airport security badges, government sources said on
Tuesday.
The arrests will be announced by Attorney General John Ashcroft
later in the day in Alexandria, Virginia, officials said.
The arrests
marked a continuing post Sept. 11 crackdown by U.S. law enforcement and
transportation authorities on airport security lapses.
Many of the
charges -- including those being brought against workers at Washington's Ronald
Reagan National Airport and Dulles International Airport outside the capital --
involve allegations that suspects violated immigration and Social Security
laws.
Also, the government alleges that many arrested on Tuesday in the
greater Washington area lied about criminal records while applying for security
badges, the sources said.
It was unclear initially what jobs those
employees performed.
As of last week, more than 250 people had been
arrested at 11 U.S. airports on charges they fraudulently obtained credentials
for access to sensitive airport areas, like ramps, gates and
aircraft.
Roughly half have pleaded guilty or have plea agreements
pending, authorities said. More than 70 have been deported or are awaiting
deportation proceedings, authorities said.
___________________________________
9-11 Frame-up: The Pentagon Evidence Proves
It
Here is the critical information needed to
derive an informed opinion of what really happened on September 11,
2001:
Consider what citizen investigators have uncovered regarding
the alleged "attack" on the Pentagon:
1. Pentagon security camera
shows
a. Too short a plane
b. Smoke trail of a missile being fired
c.
White-hot flash explosion consistent with a missile warhead
2. Photos
show wrong crash imprint in the wall
3. Photos show and wrong
flash-powder burn darkening the wall
4. Downed lampposts and witnesses
each identified a different
approach path to the
Pentagon, the Boeing's and the killer jet's
5. Wrong kind of
debris
6. Single piece of right kind of debris shown to have
been
found on the opposite side of the approach path
from
the side of the plane where that particular piece
had
to have come from.
7. Witnesses
also
a. heard a missile
b. heard a sonic boom prior
to blast
c. smelled burning chordite after the blast
d. saw a radar blip behaving like a jet-fighter blip
8. No photos of
wreckage from inside consistent with the crash
9. Evidence of only one
engine and one seat , a pilots seat.
10. A distraction plane, ur engine
plane making dives over D.C.
both photographed, videotaped
and shown on BBC, and
reported (erroneously) by many
wintesses as the actual plane
"diving at an irrecoverable
angle)
11. The attack was made almost horizontally into the
first-floor
level -- consistent with a
countour-hugging jet-fighter attack
12. Normal rescuers were prevented
from entering the building
while only certain people, including
Rumsfeld himself, conducted
(screened) victims from the
building
13. Rumsfeld had recently been given exclusive power
to
OK air interceptions -- and yet he was in his office the
whole
time the twin towers were hit, and when the Pentagon
was
hit he went to oversee "rescue" instead of going to the
situation
room where his interception authority could be given
-- he
arrived at the situation room at about the time the
Pennsylvania
plane (backup for the Pentagon) was finally shot
down.
14. The various drills and practices for an air attack on the
Pentagon
including some kind of simulation on 9-11-01 itself,
coupled with
denials that such an attack had been considered
possible.
15. Impossible stories by, for example, John Judge
(regarding
his amazing stewardess friend who claims
to have seen the
Boeing inside the hole, recognized the plane as the one
she
always flew, recongized her stewardess friend as
a victim by
a photo of her severed arm with the
matching "friendship
bracelett" they both
wore; that she was passing out
doughnuts and
coffee to the rescue workers with the salvation
army
when the salvation army was nowhere in evidence at
the
scene -- John Judge who is a
professional JFK conspiracy
theory debunker and
discloses that this same stewardess
friend is also a
JFK theory investigator, the same
John Judge who
launched the phony "People's Investigation
of 9-11 with a press conference by stating that the
Pentagon
attack is not something responsible
investigators should bother
investigating etc.
since we "know" the Boeing hit the Pentagon
and don't
want to be a laughing stock etc. -- the People's
investigation that never once reviewed any of the evidence
packages I posted to them -- the same John Judge who to
this
day refuses to debate Dick Eastman on any internet
forum and
whom all -- dare I use the term --
"responsible" 9-11 investigators
think is a
John Judge who is working for the coverup, for
obstruction of justice, and because he does it so badly is
himself
become one of the proofs of the
frameup along with the known-
only-to himself
flight
attendant who works one of the flights that
most
definitely had to have been regularly monitored by
US intelligence operatives, probably flight attendents,
and
this one just happened not to take Flight 77 that day
by
happenstance etc. -- so how about it, Mr.
Judge?
16. The deaths of only the CIA's indepdendent
intelligence
revivals , the Offices of Naval
Intelligence personel, and
auditors of defense
spending contracts etc. alone moved
into the "newly
renovated" section that was hit -- on the side
where most
of the witnesses would be the Arlington Cemetery
dead or
people involved with driving their cars. Naval
Intelligence
would have independently investigated 9-11
had they lived --
the investigator that no official has
yet conducted -- Wolfowitz
sure bin Laden had done
it and ready with the solution of invading
Afganistan on the very first day -- even as they were allegedly
taken by complete
suprise only a few hours before that
___________________________________
Dick Eastman post of Sept. 18, 2001:
Jerusalem Post, Monday September 17, 2001
Mossad warned CIA of attacks - report By Douglas
DavisLONDON (September 17) - Mossad officials traveled
to Washington last
month to warn the CIA and the FBI that a cell of up to 200
terrorists
was planning a major operation, according to a report in the
Sunday
Telegraph here yesterday.
The paper said the Israeli officials
specifically warned their
counterparts in Washington that "large-scale
terrorist attacks on highly
visible targets on the American mainland were
imminent." They offered no
specific information about targets, but they did
link the plot to
Afghanistan-based terrorist Osama bin Laden, and they told
the Americans
there were "strong grounds" for suspecting Iraqi
involvement.
(2) The UsaJewish site repeats the story, but adds that
Lebanon's Druze
leader Walid Jumblatt believes that Mossad itself is behind
the attack
... "to provoke a new war and impoverish and occupy the Middle
East,"
Jumblatt was quoted as saying.
http://www.usajewish.com/scripts/usaj/paper/Article.asp?ArticleID=1291(3)
I checked the Jerusalem Post, and UsaJewish, for reports on American
Jews
killed in the NY attack, but could find no mention of this
topic.
Strange?
(4) Mossad's inside information suggests either (1) it
is right that Bin
Laden is behind the attack, OR (2) that Mossad itself may
be quilty.
After all, Israel had no qualms about sinking the USS Liberty,
and
Israel gains greatly if it can get America to destroy Islam for
it.
(5) Thus the importance of thoroughly investigating the unusual
share
transactions before the attack. They offer the best way of tracking
down
those responsible.
___________________________________
Here is more of the NYT front-page article, A New War and Its
Scale,
by Michael R. Gordon (excerpt from page three):
"The
terrorist organizations themselves and the terrorists don't have
targets of
high value," Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said today on
the Fox
News Channel. "They don't have have armies and navies and air
forces
that one can go battle against. They don't have capital cities
with
high-value assets that they're reluctant to lose."
"He added:
"Some countries that are harboring terrorists networks do, in
fact, have
high-value targets. They do have capitals. They do
have
armies." Deputy Secretary of State Paul D. Wolfowitz spoke last
week of
ending states who sponsor terrorism." Officials now say that he
misspoke,
that he meant to say that the goal is ending state
support.
"In some cases, like Afganistan, that may be a semantic issue
since the goal
would be to dislodge the Taliban rulers if they refused to
cooperate with
Washington's counter terrorism campaign.
"In other
cases, political economic and limited military pressure may be
aplied.
The Bush administration has certainly not committed itself to
invading all
the nations on the State Department's list of those found to
help terrorists
-- Iran, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Libya, Cuba and North Korea."
___________________________________
I notice that China -- a backer of Latin American
narco-terrorists
is not on the list, and neither is Israel, which perhaps, in
view of
the foregoing, may very well belong there.
Dick Eastman
223
S. 64th Ave
Yakima, Washington
Every man is responsible to every other
man.
(so kill me, already)
___________________________________
And what about Logan Airport, in
Boston?
Two Foreign-Owned Companies Have Airport
Security in WTC Attack
Foreign Affairs News Keywords: WTC, TERRORISM, NWO
Source:
Various
Published: September 16, 2001 Author: Jedediah Smith
Posted on
09/16/2001 12:15:37 PDT by jedediah smith
While it is possible that Tuesday's WTC attack could have been the
result of sloppy airport security, the natural suspicion is that the terrorists
had inside help to permit them to smuggle their weapons onboard. Obviously this
points a finger at the organization and/or persons in charge of security at the
airports. The Newark Airport security is handled by the Ports Authority, a
quasi-governmental agency which also has security for WTC. The Dulles Airport
security is also handled by a government agency. Both of these could easily have
been infiltrated by terrorists or their accomplices. But even more
interestingly, security at the Logan International Aiport in Boston was
contracted out by the Mass. Port Authority to two companies, Globe Aviation
Services of Irving, Texas and Huntleigh USA Corp. of St. Louis. If we explore
further, some motivation may be uncovered that would give reason for these firms
to cooperate with the terrorists.
which is headquartered in the Netherlands, and most of their
business is in Europe. Chairman Ezra Harel and Menachem Atzmon control 47% of
the stock (see
___________________________________
Here is what I had written before Mark
Phoned:
The Boeing overflew the Sheraton Hotel and the tape from the
video camera on the roof was confiscated immediately. There was a second
security camera facing west attached to the same building from which the five
famous pictures of the killer jet's approach and the the subsequent explosion
shots. Pictures from that camera were not released either. And there was
the security cam at the gas station on the other side of Washington Blvd. which,
like the Sheraton camera, would have caputred the Boeing going over the gas
station on its way to the Pentagon (remember: if the Boeing was indeed
over the gas station at all it could not have been the aircraft that knocked
down the southmost lamppost that stood south of the Pentagon-parking turn-off
overpass.) and this too was never released. WHY NOT? WHAT GAIN DOES
THE WHITE HOUSE AND PENTAGON DERIVE FROM NOT ANSWERING THE STRONG
"SMALL-PLANE" EVIDENCE THAT IS BELIEVED BY MILLIONS AROUND THE WORLD? WHAT
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS COULD LEAD THE ADMINISTRATION TO WITHOLD THIS EVIDENCE
(ESPECIALLY SINCE THEY ALREADY HAVE RELEASED VIDEO'S THAT SHOW THE FUSELAGE OF
THE KILLER JET CONCEALED BEHIND A PARKING-PASS PILLAR IN THE FOREGROUND -- ONE
FRAME SELECTED BECAUSE IT IS THE FRAME THAT SHOWS PART OF A PLANE BUT
DISALLOWS IDENTIFICATION OF THE EXACT TYPE OF PLANE -- EXCEPT FOR THE DEDUCTION
MADE BY SCIENTIFICALLY TRAINED CITIZENS PROVING THAT THE PLANE BELONGING TO THE
VISIBLE TAIL FIN WAS TOO SHORT TO BE THE BOEING.) "Velasquez
says the gas station's security cameras are close enough to the Pentagon
to have recorded the moment of impact. "I've never seen what the pictures
looked like," he said. "The FBI was here within minutes and took the
film."
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2001/12/1211_wirepentagon.html
___________________________________
On the morning of September 11, the present Chairman of the Joint Chiefs
of
Staff, General Richard B. Myers, was having a routine meeting on
Capitol
Hill with Senator Max Cleland. Just before the meeting
began,
"While in an outer office, he said, he saw a television report
that a plane
had hit the World Trade Center. 'They thought it was a small
plane or
something like that,' Myers said. So the two men went ahead with the
office
call."
--'American Forces Press Service' 23 October 2001
(1)
The meeting went on for some time. While the two men chatted away, a
second
hijacked jet plowed into the World Trade Center's south tower and a
third
one into the Pentagon. And still they went on with their
meeting.
"Meanwhile, the second World Trade Center tower was hit by
another jet.
'Nobody informed us of that,' Myers said. 'But when we came out,
that was
obvious. Then, right at that time, somebody said the Pentagon had
been hit.'
"Somebody thrust a cell phone in Myers' hand. Gen. Ralph
Eberhart, commander
of U.S. Space Command and the North American Aerospace
Defense Command was
on the other end of the line 'talking about what was
happening and the
actions he was going to take.'
--'American Forces Press
Service' 23 October 2001 (1)
___________________________________
12.09.01
AIR FORCE 9.11 STAND-DOWN
ORDERS CAME FROM HIGHEST LEVEL o/t EXECUTIVE
BRANCH
Cheney, bush: the Air Force and Army would like a
word with you.
- - - - - - - -
Note: Brian Quiq died in a parking lot at 2:00 a.m.about a year ago, run
over by some teens on drugs. The Quigs_Fight yahoogroup, which
I moderate, is dedicated to his memory and his cause.
From: "Brian Downing Quig" <
quig@dcia.com>
To:
cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com,
top_view@planetmail.com,
bushcoup2000@yahoogroups.coSubject:
911 ORDERS FROM THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH!!
Date: Sun, 09
Dec 2001 18:35:23-0700
This writer, who is identified only by
top_view@planetmail.com, by
example
knows what he is talking about. He knows what Mike Ruppert and I
knew
immediately and some in this discussion are having a very hard
time
grasping.
The Air Force spokesman confirmed that AFTER the alerts
and requests for
INTERCEPTS of the aircraft were received from FAA/ATC,
orders from the
HIGHEST LEVEL of the executive branch of the federal
government were
received, demanding that the Air Force stand down and NOT
follow through
with ESTABLISHED scramble/intercept procedures that morning
until
further notice!
The writer is going from something he knows ---
somewhere in the
executive branch a STAND DOWN ORDER was issued --- to a
pretty good
guess of a probable culprit. The writer is 100% on the mark when
he
discribes Cheney's deliberate confusion about the INTERCEPT
PROCEDURES.
Cheney needs to explain why he lied about Bush having to make
the
decision to shoot down flight 77 on 9-11-01.
I feel that this
writer is moving the discussion in the right direction.
Brian
Quig
CTRL@LISTSERV.AOL.COMhttp://disc.server.com/Indices/149495.html
___________________________________
Suspected Israeli Spies
Held by U.S.
Wednesday, December 12, 2001
WASHINGTON — Some 60 Israelis, who federal investigators
have said are part of a long-running effort to spy on American government
officials, are among the hundreds of foreigners detained since the Sept. 11
terror attacks, Fox News has learned.
The Israelis, a handful of whom are described as active
Israeli military or intelligence operatives, have been detained on immigration
charges or under the new Patriot Anti-Terrorism Law. Federal investigators said
some of them failed polygraph questions inquiring about alleged surveillance
activities against and in the United States.
There is no indication the Israelis were involved in the
Sept. 11 attacks, but investigators suspect that they may have gathered
intelligence about the attacks in advance and not shared it.
A highly placed investigator told Fox News there are
"tie-ins," but when asked for details flatly refused to describe them. "Evidence
linking these Israelis to 9-11 is classified, I cannot tell you about evidence
that has been gathered. It is classified information," the source said.
An Israeli Embassy spokesman offered categorical denials, and
said any suggestion of Israelis spying on or in the United States is simply not
true.
But Fox News has learned that one group of Israelis spotted
in North Carolina recently is suspected of keeping an apartment in California to
spy on a group of Arabs who the U.S. authorities are investigating for links to
terrorism.
Numerous classified documents obtained by Fox News indicate
that even prior to Sept. 11, as many as 140 other Israelis had been detained or
arrested in a secretive and sprawling investigation into suspected espionage by
Israelis in the United States.
Investigators from numerous government agencies are part of a
working group that has been compiling evidence in the case since the mid-1990s.
These documents detail hundreds of incidents in cities and towns across the
country that investigators say quote "may well be an organized
intelligence-gathering activity."
Investigators are focusing part of their efforts on Israelis
who said they are art students from the University of Jerusalem or Bezalel
Academy and repeatedly made contact with U.S. government personnel by saying
they wanted to sell cheap art or handiwork.
Documents say they "targeted" and penetrated military bases,
the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Federal Bureau of Investigations,
dozens of government facilities and even secret offices and unlisted private
homes of law enforcement and intelligence personnel.
Another part of the investigation has resulted in the
detention and arrest of dozens of Israelis working at kiosks in American malls,
where they had been selling toys called "Puzzlecar" and "Zoomcopter."
Investigators suspected a front. Shortly after the New
York Times and Washington Post reported the detentions of Israelis on
immigration charges last month, the carts began vanishing.
Another draft post, this one dated 9/24/2001 on my
hard drive Windows 98 documents file:
US government officials today released a photograph of Mohammed Atta and
a
man they think is Abdulaziz Alomari, key members of the terrorist team
who
flew American Airlines Flight 11 into the north tower of the World
Trade
Center, killing 81 passengers and crew.
They were filmed as they
passed through Portland Airport on their way to
Boston, where they hijacked
the flight to Los Angeles. Atta, 33, who had
received pilot's training, is
believed to have flown the doomed airliner.
The security picture appears to
end the debate about whether Atta really was
one of the hijackers. Yesterday
his father claimed he had spoken to him
since the disaster.
In a
second breakthrough, officials now say they are succeeding in following
the
money trail used by the hijackers to fund their operation. It is now
believed
that all 19 hijack suspects shared a single contact within the US
who
provided them with cash.
The money was used to pay for flight lessons,
rent and even withdrawals at
automatic cashpoints. Two of the hijackers, Hani
Hanjour and Majed Moqed,
were pictured together withdrawing money from a cash
machine in Florida. The
FBI and the Federal Reserve have sent letters to
banks throughout the
country, asking for any records of financial
transactions involving the 19
suspects, including credit card
receipts.
Investigators hope recent changes in international banking
agreements will
allow them to follow the money back to sources outside the
US, particularly
the prime suspect Osama bin Laden. Analysts are also
checking reports of
unusual trading in the US stock options market before the
attack. An
extraordinary number of trades were betting that American Airlines
stock
price would fall. A similar inquiry has been launched in
Britain.
But the investigation into the terrorists is being hampered by
questions of
identity. It appears that five of the hijackers were using
stolen
identities. Many of them seem to have adopted the personas of
real-life
commercial and military pilots.
In Saudi Arabia, five of the
alleged hijackers have emerged, alive and
astonished to see their names and
photographs appearing on satellite
television. Yesterday, the Londonbased
Asharq al-Awsat newspaper said it had
interviewed Mr Alomari in Riyadh, and
that he had left the US in April 2000.
It said the American-educated engineer
had reported to police that his
passport was stolen when his flat in Denver
was burgled in 1995.
Ahmed al-Shehri, a Saudi diplomat told another
newspaper that details of
another hijacker matched his son Waleed, who now
lives in Morocco.
The pilot with Saudi Arabian Airlines graduated four
years ago from
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Florida. Another Saudi
pilot, Said
Hussein al-Ghamdi, whose picture was released by the US
authorities may in
fact be living in Tunis and may have been falsely accused.
While the
American authorities remain convinced that Bin Laden masterminded
the
attacks, they are also hinting that a number of states may have helped.
The
first criminal charges arising from the attacks have been filed
against
three Detroit men - Karim Koubriti, 23, Ahmed Hannan, 33, and
Farouk
Ali-Haimoud, 21, who are accused of fraud and misuse of visas,
passports and
other immigration documents.
Further details are also
emerging about what happened on the hijacked planes
themselves. Federal
investigators believe that some of the pilots and
co-pilots of the aircraft
were murdered before the planes crashed.
FBI technicians have recovered
fragments of conversations from within one of
the doomed cockpits; much of it
is described however as "a jumbled mixture
of grunts and
screams".
They have confirmed that the bodies of two stewardesses from
United Flight
93, which crashed in Pennsylvania, were found with their hands
bound.
The FBI has launched a nationwide manhunt for 190 people it
believes may
have information relating to the terrorist attacks. As many as
37 on the
bureau's "watch list" are believed to have had flight training.
Some had
booked reservations on flights scheduled to take place after last
week's
attacks, including flights coming out of Boston and San Antonio
this
weekend. FBI officials are seeking to play down fears of a second wave
of
attacks on Saturday. Spokeswoman Mindy Tucker said there is "no
credible
evidence", although Americans have been warned to be
vigilant.
There is, however, new evidence of the extent to which Bin
Laden has been
seeking to arm himself. According to the Russian news agency
Itar-Tass, the
Russian secret services prevented a deal to buy weapons grade
uranium by a
Pakistani company controlled by Bin Laden.
And this very very important one from Oct. 6,
2001:
Newsgroups:
alt.radio.uk.talk-radio,alt.internet.talk.radio,alt.internet.talk.shows,alt.radio.international,alt.radio.talk
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2001 10:22 PM
Subject: THE ESATABLISHMENT KNEW, both top republicans
and top democrats: TIME FOR MASS RESIGNATIONS/MPEACHMENTS
...
Mr. Eastman,
I read your article on the rense site. The person who
sent you some notes
on connie rice, did not have the fortune of seeing
rumsfield on the 9th of
sept in an interview on fox news like I did. it was a
late sunday afternoon
or early evening, The interview was with brit hume I am
pretty sure, and
rumsfield was unusually happy about the coming week where
his defense budget
cuts would be reversed, in fact he was inferring that his
budget would be
increased by a large % when congress would come to understand
how important
defense was to national security. It was such an interesting
interview I
made my wife sit down and watch it which is very unusual because
like most
women, she is not into the global or national events...and my vibes
from it
were not good. That sept 11 evening interview with the pentagon at 9
pm had
all the big wigs on, again rumsfield was the point man for the
press
conference. after his speech the first question taken from a reporter
was
right to rumsfield and he asked him if intelligence or anyone high up in
the
government had any knowledge of the events. Rumsfield looked like he
got
punched in the stomach, looked down and away and said " I cant answer
any
questions of a national security issue" I was like what heck,
total
destruction and this guy looks away as guilty as sin and wont answer
the
reporters question. if you get your hands on the video footage of the
press
conf, its a real eye opener. Bottom line, they knew, what other reason
was
pres bush out of dc for over a month, and "on vacation finding peace
and
quiet. " More crap. just how stupid do they think we are. Today my
wife
showed me a picture of a 31 year old fire man she went to school with
and is
listed as "missing". They can lie all they want, all you have to do
is
follow the " wacko conspiarcy writings for the last 10-20 years to see
where
we are headed next.
(end of letter)
___________________________________
HERE
IS YET ONE MORE POST FROM THIS OLD COMPUTER I AM USING SINCE MY
GOOD ONE HAS BEEN TAKEN DOWN BY A VIRUS THAT PREVENTS ME FROM SENDING OR
RECEIVING, BUT WHICH BOTH SENDS AND RECEIVE INFORMATION THAT I HAVE NOT
SENT OR CLEARED OR EVEN KNOW WHAT IT IS WHENEVER I CONNECT --
IT WAS SAVED AS AN INCOMPLETE DRAFT, AND PROBLABLY MAILED IN COMPLETED FORM TO
VARIOUS NEWSGROUPS -- BUT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IS NOT IRRLEVANT TO
THE ABOVE DISCUSSION:
WTC destroyed for many reasons (many people
needed incentive to participate in the false-flag black-op mass-murder
frameup) -- One definite outcome of the collapse of the North Tower was the
destruction of federal "gold case" evidence. How convenient was the WTC
crashbombing for defendents Greenspan, Morgan, Chase, and Goldman Sachs. The
investigation was being conducted from the 24th floor of the North Tower where
the Securities and Exchange Commission had offices and stored records. The
defendants in the GATA/Howe lawsuit were: the Bank for International
Settlements; Alan Greenspan, chairman of the Board of Governors of the U.S.
Federal Reserve System and a director of the BIS; William J. McDonough,
president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and a director of the BIS;
five major bullion banks, J.P. Morgan & Co., Chase Manhattan Corp.,
Citigroup Inc., Goldman Sachs Group Inc., and Deutsche Bank; and Lawrence H.
Summers, former secretary of the treasury, who by law exercised control over the
U.S.Exchange Stabilization Fund, subject only to approval by the
president. No legal proceedings like this had ever gone so far against
some of the most powerful men and institutions on Wall Street. --- The action
against the Bank for International Settlements, the U.S. Federal Reserve
and
Treasury Department, and several bullion banks has been brought by a
consultant for the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee, GATA, Reginald H. Howe, a
private shareholder in the BIS. GATA was formed in January 1999, the same month
that the world's leading bullion banks, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan and ten others,
joined together to form a 'Counterparty Risk Management Group' to, as they put
it, 'strengthen risk management practices'. For six months prior to that,
evidence had been mounting that whenever the price of gold threatened to rise
above $300 an ounce the bullion banks moved in to knock the price back again,
mainly by selling gold borrowed at around 1 percent interest from central banks.
--- After the formation of the Counterparty Risk Management Group, the price
fixing became more obvious, and it has continued uninterruptedly to the present
day, with only one break through the $300 mark, which was quickly suppressed by
the gold cartel. -- The practice has been very profitable for the banks
and their principal customers, through what is called the ?gold carry
trade? More importantly, for currency speculators, it had
served to underpin the over-valued dollar so useful in the cannibalising of the
real economy by the financial sector, i.e., by the transnational bankers,
currency and stock exchange speculators and gold
price manipulators. By
"fixing the price of gold" is meant selling of the Federal Reserve gold
stock in exchange for the Federal Reserves own US dollar notes (which the Fed
can create at the will) and doing so at below otherwise market
dollar-price-of-gold prices -- keeping dollar price low on the
excchanges, i.e., giving away U.S. economic strength -- gold is permanent
value, dollars are mere fiat debt instruments whose value fluctuates with the
balance of payments, international debt structure and other voluable economic
and political considerations. In other words they sold gold extra cheap to
their friends in international finance.also this amounts to selling the U.S.
Central Bank's gold to their friends.
And what ever happened to the gold price fixing
case after the first investigation perished withthe North Tower? Very
simple -- the government decided that it was too threatened by terrorism
to devote resources to investigating low priority things like that.
Since the attack there has been the most fundamental reorganization of the
Federal Bureau of Investigation in its history, shifting its focus to
counterterrorism, that is, to focus on fighting anti-globalization
movements, and away from crime fighting. Under Attorney General Ashcroft
and FBI Director Robert Mueller III the FBI has given up
responsibility for most of its old legendary duties involving bank robbery and
white collar financial crime, including the gold-price fixing
investigation the FBI was conducting in North Tower when the tower and all of
the evidence and documentation was destroyed. (Incidentally, the team of
investigators who put Warren Buffet in prison over the S&L scandal also
perished on the 24th floor that day.) Look at these quotations (and
between the lines), from the New York Times:
"As counterterrorism becomes the No. 1 priority
of the F.B.I., it has become obvious that other types of investigation will have
to be de-emphasized at the bureau or turned over to other agencies," said a
senior administation official, one of several interviewed in recent days
who have been involved in the discussions.
" Some officials say the restructuring has
already begun, even before any formal palns have been proposed, propelled by the
terror attacks of September. 11, when thousands of bureau agents across the
country were ordered to put aside other investigations to focus exclusively on
counterterrorism."
Also in the article:
"...Attorney General Ashcroft and the
bureau's director, Robert S. Mueller III, have agreed that the emphasis on
counterterrorism will be permanent and that other major changers are
inevitable. ..."
"...Mr. Mueller, as the bureau's new
director. Mr. Mueller had earned a fearsome reputation from previous jobs,
for shaking up government sagncies, notably the United States attorney's office
in San Francisco, where he forced out most of the senior managment." [This
during the Clinton years! -- and this is exactly what CLinton's appointee,
Louis J. Freeh, did when he took the job -- throwing out the
top drug fighters from a list he brought with him before he took office
- these non-political professionals were all demoted and removed within
two days -- giving druglords a very easy time with no seasoned top men
running the show--DE].
--------
March 8, 2002 release of 5 security
camera video pictures from the Pentagon:
HI;
Someone must be monitoring your site. Today for the first
time, The
Pentagon has felt it had to show pictures of a plane ramming
their
building.
I taped it, as Wolf Blitzer was showing
Jamie McIntire's Pentagon
pictures allegedly taken off a Pentagon
camera.
I put it on slow motion and saw no plane. Not only that, it
has been
'messed' with. It shows clips. It looks like 3 clips. The same
pictures,
or shots with Jamie McIntire were shown next on the Moneyline
show. The
same questions asked with the same answers. Jamie pointing to
where
you're supposed to see a plane coming along the ground about 2
feet
above the ground before it hits the Pentagon. I have yet to see a
plane.
If there is one, there certainly is not a passenger plane. What
it looks
like to me is a release of material before an explosion. Like
the
pressure couldn't hold it any more and spewed it out. This film
must
have just been doctored for our use. There is no plane in the
film.
There is not even a semblence of a plane. There only remains the
lie.
=====================
Meanwhile, there was bad news for the drug dealers
who may have thought they
got a break when the evidence collected by the
federal Drug Enforcement
Administration was buried in the rubble of 6 World
Trade Center.
Drugs, Cash Recovered
On Saturday, the feds finally reached
the vaults where millions of dollars
worth of powder and crack cocaine,
heroin, Ecstasy and other narcotics were
stashed - along with millions in
ill-gotten cash.
"They knew it was there and wanted to get it out," said
Richard Ricciardi,
45, a heavy-equipment operator for Seasons Construction.
"The face of the
building was blown off and they asked us to remove the piles
of debris
around it. There were big boxes and bags of evidence."
Lucchese,
40, of the Bronx, said the feds filled a truck with loot and
drugs. "The
stuff had DEA evidence tags on it," he said. "They said it was a
DEA
vault."
-----------
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2001 7:36
PM
Subject: Last Words of Flight Attendent .....
> FYI .... A
small item in the many posted notes on the '911' attacks or is
it?
>
This reporting of the final words of a flight attendant trying
to
communicate
> their best firsthand knowledge of a hijacking in
progress may be long
> considered in future analysis of these events. Do
you wonder too, just who
> was assigned to the seat numbers she read off?
>From NG / Original source
for
> this story was the BBC. Ronn
01/29/01
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: SEAT
NUMBERS DON'T MATCH !
> From: zzuppidu@yahoo.com (zak ah'zuban)
> Date: Sat, Sep 29, 2001 4:10
PM
> Message-id: <fcfdf8f8.0109291510.7740985f@posting.google.com>
>
> BBC reports that a flight
attendant
> on board Flight 11, that hit WTC, called
> ground staff
in Boston to report hijack
> in progress...only one problem...she
>
said there were only 4 hijackers, while
> the FBI said 5, and she called
out the
> seat numbers of the 4...those seats
> don't match the seat
numbers of the men
> with arabic sounding names who were assigned
>
responsibility for the hijack afterwards
> by FBI...?????
>
>
Quote from the BBC:
> "Ms Sweeney's account of the hijacking
>
provides unique evidence of what took place
> but it also appears to
conflict with previous
> information.
>
> The FBI has named
five hijackers on board
> Flight 11, whereas Ms Sweeney spotted
only
> four.
>
> Also, the seat numbers she gave were
>
different from those registered in the hijackers'
> names. " [ end of
quote ]
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/americas/newsid_1556000/1556096.stm
>
___________________________________
9/11 Pentagon Event: Alleged crash witness James S.
Robbins caught in false
account: contradicts Pentagon video when he claims he
saw 757 "diving in at
an unrecoverable angle" -- the National-Security
Analyst thus implicated in
9/11 mass-murder-frame-up.
Here is ample
convicting evidence for the 9/11 frame-up and cover-up.. The
only question
is, will people have the nerve ask that it be acted upon.
(See
below.)
[By the way an implication of this discovery is the
opening of the
possibility that Sharon is not acting from Zionism at all,
that Israel's
security is not his primary interest in his conducting
his "war on
Palestinian terrorism" -- it may be merely a
distraction and the agitation
of chaos and violence to provide pretext for a
globalist economic war of
conquest (eliciting Arab terrorism throug
coercion -- like kicking a dog
until it bites you ) --
Sharon really working for the investment banking
(Rothschilds etc.) and Big
Oil interests in seeking pretexts and the
psychological climate for an
aggressive grab of Afgan, Iraqi and Iranian oil
(-as they just tried to grab
Venezulan oil in a CIA-planned coup against a
populist government that was
using the oil profits to beneift the people
etc.) --I know this
is "out of the blue -- but there is BIG EVIDENCE TO
BACK IT UP -- see
the following for that evidence:
___________________________________
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 8:35 PM
Subject: Pentagon crash witness James S. Robbins caught giving
fabrication cover-up account: of 9/11 Pentagon attack-- totally contradicts
Pentagon's own video of level approach in claiming he saw 757 "diving in at an
unrecoverable angle"
Discredited: James S. ("I-saw-it.") Robbins contradicts Pentagon video
when
he claims he saw 757 "diving in at an unrecoverable angle is frozen in
my
memory"
___________________________________
National-Security Analyst and National Review contributor
James S. Robbins
claims that Thierry Meyssan is a "nitwit" for concluding
that a Boeing 757
did not hit the Pentagon and does so, he admits, without
reading Meyssan's
book.
Yet it is Robbins himself who contradicts
other witnesses and the Pentagon
video video when he claims he saw a Boeing
757 "diving in at an
unrecoverable angle is frozen in my memory." It is
not the claim of seeing
a 757 that catches up Robbins, but his claim that he
saw it in a dive. The
video shows a horizontal approach and other witnesses
claim it was a
"tree-top level appraoch" and a "level appraoch" 20 feet above
ground level.
The F-16 that attacked the Pentagon had the
ground-contour-hugging
capability to appraoch horizontally and that is why
the cover-up lie
requires a "diving" 757. Robbin's false testimony is
as good as a
confession to this investigator.
Also, the account that
must be beaten is not Meyssan's "no-plane" theory,
but the Bosankoe -
Eastman discovery from direct replicable observation of
the D.o.D's own hard
data, the security video camera which captured the
event. (See
below.)
Enough is now known about the Sept. 11 frame-up attacks in New
York and
Washington D.C. to put the cuffs on Bush, Cheney, Kissinger,
Rumsfeld,
Wolfowitz, Rice, Gingrich, Pearle and to hold the entire
Trilateral
Commission on suspicion.
See if you don't agree after you
examin the following evidence.
We knew their motives: 1) The Taliban was
erradicating the Norther Alliance
druglord opium that the Triad Chinese use
to make the heroin that sells for
$2 trillion a year, the proceeds laundered
into U.S. and City of London
investment banks to build slave labor in China;
2) Control of Central Asian
Oil Reserves ($6 trillion total) and the pipeline
the and corporation
domination the Taliban would not happen; 3) all the war
profiteering that
Rep. Cynthia McKinney (now under attack because they found
Moslems who
support Palestinians who contributed to her campaign) has pointed
out that
Bush and Cheney-tied firms are to enjoy; 4) totalitarian controls
that makes
the ruling CFR syndicate invincible against any
populist/progressive (now
labeled pro-terrorist and "for-us-or-against-us
traitors;" 5) pretext for
grabbing Iraqi and Iranian oil holdings (as they
tried to capture #3 oil
producer Venezuela by US-staged coup d'etat
last week) -- to create the
final global oil monopoly; 6) to crush Islam,
which is the populism of
Central Asia, North Afric and the Middle East --
their only moral-system
counterbalance to despotism in cultures dominated by
tribal hatreds (all
Moslems are brothers, tithe 10 percent to the poor, true
equality among men
before God, and anti-usury etc. -- whatever you may
think about it).
But now we have proof that the Administration had much
more than just "prior
knowledge" of 911.
Read this carefully -- it is
information in the race between libertaion and
snuff-out. Speed it
on.
___________________________________
NEW YORK
(September 12, 2001) - ...Deputy Secretary of State Paul W. Wolfowitz spoke last
week of "ending states who sponsor terrorism."
===========Here is the direct visual evidence supplied by the D.o.D. that
the
Pentagon was attacked not by a crashbombing Boeing 757, but by
a
remotely-controlled F-16 Falcon that approached horizonally at
20 feet
using automatic ground-countour-hugging guidance and, no
more than two
seconds before its own impact also fired an air-to-
ground missile into the
Pentagon ahead of its own collision.
http://www.bosankoe.btinternet.co.uk/pentagon.gifPay close attention to 1) the F-16 silhouette; 2) the
white
plume of the missile being fired; 3) the super-white-hot initial
blast
characteristic of the high-explosives of a ground to air missile and
not
of burning jet or helicopter fuel --
David Bosankoe of the U.K.
has enlarged a section
of the clip of the Pentagon attack event taken
by
security video camera and released by the Department
of Defense, but he
has also gathered other supporting
evidence that you may review
at:
http://www.bosankoe.btinternet.co.uk/In addition, far ranging debate on this topic has
been
conducted in the uk.politics.crime Usenet newsgroup,
which you may
access at http://groups.google.com/and
typing in uk.politics.crime.
After close examination I am convinced that
the
clip does supports neither the official story of a Boeing
757 hitting
the building, nor the "French "where's the plane?"
site story that "no plane
at all" was involved in the deadly explosions.
It is also significant
that the one pilot who claimed to have witnessed
a Boeing 757 hit the
Pentagon also claimed that the airliner "dived"
into the side of the building
--and so by the D.o.D.'s own video
he is discredited.
Here are two
letters relevant to this topic, the first dealing with the
Pentagon attack
deception and the second in reply to the Atlanta
Journal-Constitution's
attack on Rep. Cynthia McKinney's after her call for
an investigation into
the events of September 11.
Dick Eastman
223 S. 64th Ave.
Yakima,
Washington 98908
(509) 965-4893
___________________________________
> Here is James S. Robbins, National-Security Analyst and National
Review
> contributor caught in his lie to the American people and to the
world -- his
> lie about the Pentagon attack. [It is interesting
that another
> ultra-conservative publisher, Regnery, also claims to have
seen a diving
> 757. Hmmm.]
> 4-19-2
>
>
http://www.rense.com/general24/ff.htm>
> Likewise with the Sept. 11 attacks, it is incumbent to remember, and
through
> memory to prevent similar events from happening again. The
images of the WTC
> attacks speak for themselves. Where video is lacking,
as in the case of
> Flight 77 (which is more proof of the plot, says
Meyssan) it is up to the
> eyewitnesses to tell their stories.
>
> So here's mine. I was in my Washington office doing research when one
of the
> secretaries told me that an aircraft had hit the World Trade
Center. We
> brought the news up on the projection screen in our darkened
conference room
> and watched the coverage, seeing endless six-foot high
replays of the
> impacts and explosions. It was unsettling, even
disorienting, but my
> colleagues and I were appraising it professionally,
trading theories on who
> was to blame and how the terrorists coordinated
the attacks. We did not come
> to any firm conclusions.
>
> I
went back to my office around 9:20. A short time later a friend of mine
>
called, an Air Force officer, and we spoke awhile about the strikes in
New
> York. I was standing, looking out my large office window, which
faces west
> and from six stories up has a commanding view of the Potomac
and the
> Virginia heights. (When I hired on my boss said we had the best
view in
> town. True, most days.) The Pentagon is about a mile and half
distant in the
> center of the tableau. I was looking directly at it when
the aircraft
> struck. The sight of the 757 diving in at an unrecoverable
angle is frozen
> in my memory, but at the time, I did not immediately
comprehend what I was
> witnessing. There was a silvery flash, an
explosion, and a dark, mushroom
> shaped cloud rose over the building. I
froze, gaping for a second until the
> sound of the detonation, a sharp
pop at that distance, shook me out of it. I
> shouted something both
extremely profane and sacrilegious and told my
> friend, "They hit the
Pentagon. We're under attack. Gotta go."
>
> I hung up the phone
and turned back to the window to see the dark cloud
> spreading. I yelled
down the hall, "Look out the window!" I heard gasps
> outside, and a
researcher dashed into my office and stared. I grabbed my
> bags and said
I was getting out of the building and invited others to do the
> same. I
took the elevator down and walked to the edge of the greensward, in
> easy
view of the Pentagon across the river. I set down my bags and stood in
>
the dew soaked grass, seeing the brilliant blue sky filling with rolling
>
clouds of smoke. The blackness stretched south the length of the
horizon.
> The adrenaline of the initial shock had worn off a bit, and I
was able to
> take in the enormity of the event. Even more than witnessing
the plane
> crash, I remember those long helpless minutes standing in the
grass.
>
> So, of course, I take it personally when a half-wit like
Meyssan comes along
> saying it did not happen. And he is so evidently at
war with reality that
> one is tempted not to waste time with him. His
ideas are obviously foolish,
> easily disproved, an affront to any
reasoning person. It would be easy to
> ignore him. But that would be a
mistake. This is another front in what
> President Bush called "the war to
save civilization itself." The history of
> the 20th century should show
that no idea is so absurd that it cannot take
> destructive hold and play
havoc with societies, even to the point of
> sanctioning mass murder.
Allowing the extremists to go unchallenged only
> encourages them. People
like Lenin, Hitler, Pol Pot and other millennial
> criminals were just
like Meyssan at one point in their careers. If they had
> been opposed
more vigorously sooner, perhaps they never would have attained
> power.
When such ideas are allowed to stand, they take root among the
>
impressionable or those predisposed to think the worst. And especially
now
> that communications technology has made it possible to give global
reach to
> the bizarre and archive it forever, it is essential for men and
women of
> reason resolutely to counter the delusions of the fringe
element.
>
> I was there. I saw it.
>
http://www.nationalreview.com/robbins/robbins040902.asp>
REMEMBER -- THE KILLER
JET ENTERED THE PENTAGON AT FIRST-FLOOR LEVEL IN PERFECT HORZONTAL FLIGHT
-- ROBBINS WAS LOOKING AT THE FOUR ENGINE DISTRACTION PLANE THAT WAS DOING
EXHIBITION DIVES OVER D.C. AT THE EXACT TIME OF THE
ATTACK -- I HAVE POINTED THIS OUT IN E-MAIL TO
ROBBINS AND NATIONAL REVIEW, BUT HAVE NEVER RECEIVED A
REPLY
--Dick
Eastman
=========
A final item:
On November 18, 1998 populist Patrick
Buchanan
addressed the Council of Foreign Relations in Chicago:
" To
the new corporate elite, putting America first
betrays a lack of loyalty to
the company. Some
among our political elite share this view. Here
is
Strobe Talbott, Clinton's roommate at Oxford
and architect of his
Russian policy: "All countries,"
said Talbott in 1991, "are basically
social
arrangements...No matter how permanent and
even sacred they may
seem at any one time, in
fact they are all artificial and
temporary...within
the next hundred years...nationhood as we know
it will
be obsolete; all states will recognize a single,
global authority".... This
is the transnational elite,
our new Masters of the
Universe."
http://www.theamericancause.org/pjb-speech-chicago-cfr.html
(Go, Pat, Go! -- Dick Eastman)
___________________________________
Another Amazing Discovery -- this
news I posted days prior to 9-11:
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.green.party
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2001 11:33 AM
Subject: Re: "Israel appears to be on a
countdown"
Now a new and wholly independent source no
reasonable man
can ignore, corroboration of the Strafor Intelligence
Report
(the last posting to this thread.) See Dr. Bearden's article
below.
"Dick Eastman" <eastman@wolfenet.com> wrote in message news:...
> I forward this
praying that hardened hearts will be softened
> and the dignity and
infinite value of all men that is far above
> the goals of petty
nationalisms, ethnic chauvenism and narrow
> (and wrongly reckoned)
self-interest, will prevail as it has not
> in the bitter
past.
=====^========================
Two billion people may die in
next Middle-East-ignited
world war, a war already detected to be in
motion.
This is the war that will reach American and European
shores, and
will spread around the
world.
======^=========================
Bearden, Thomas E. Ph.D.,
nuclear engineer, retired Lieutenant
Colonel (U.S. Army), CEO of CTEC, Inc.,
Director of the
Association of Distinguished American Scientists, and
Fellow
Emeritus of the Alpha Foundation's Institute for Advanced
Study.
Tom is a theoretical conceptualist active in the study of
scalar
electromagnetics, advanced electrodynamics, unified field
theory,
KGB energetics weapons and phenomena, free energy
systems,
electromagnetic healing via the unified field action of
extended
Sachs-Evans electrodynamics, and human development.
Particularly
known for his work establishing a theory of overunity
electrical
power systems, scalar electromagnetic weapons, energetics
weapons,
and the use of time-as-energy in both power systems and
the
mind-body
interaction.
------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S.
- Syria
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 22:24:54 -0500
Fellows,
Looks as
if the maneuverings for war preparation in the MidEast
are beginning.
It doesn't take a genius to see that war in the
MidEast is now very highly
probable, and that this is an optimum
time for our adversaries because of the
drawdown of U.S. forces
below the level required to do this thing. We
are as vulnerable
right now as we are ever likely to be. Also, we are
almost
certainly going to be involved in it; there is simply no way out
of
it. In this brief article, you get a glimpse of the kind of
options the
administration must be worrying over at present.
With another MidEast
War, two things come prominently to mind: (1)
the terrorist teams, anthrax,
smallpox, and nuclear weapons
already spirited into this country and waiting
to be unleashed in
our large cities, may well be unleashed to the tune of
some
millions of U.S. casualties and extraordinary damage, and (2) a
new
energy and oil crisis that will curl your hair will be come
roaring down on
us. We will likely not get out of this one
unscathed, but probably will
suffer terrible damage.
Lunev is the highest ranking GRU defector we ever
had. Read his
book (cleared by the CIA), and he will explain to you how
the
Russians brought in large nuclear weapons to the U.S., with
their
Spetnatz teams already in place to set them off. These are
not
the little "suitcase" munitions, but weapons larger than those
dropped
on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in WW II. Several nations --
Iran, Iraq, etc. --
have also spirited in trainged, professional
terrorist teams and weapons of
mass destruction such as anthrax
and smallpox. Read "Viewpoint", by
former Senator Sam Nunn, in
Aviation Week & Space Technology, Aug. 13,
2001, p. 74, or visit
their website at www.AviationNow.com/awst. There you will get a
glimpse of how totally
unprepared we are, for what may be coming
down upon our cities in the near
future. Smallpox alone, if
unleashed again, will kill nearly two
billion people on earth, or
about one-third of the Earth's population [Laurie
Garrett, "The
Nightmare of Bioterrorism," Foreign Affairs, 80(1),
Jan./Feb.
2001, p. 76-89. Quoting p. 77: " Were a terrorist to disperse
the
smallpox virus, for example, populations that were once
universally
vaccinated would now be horribly vulnerable. Today
the U.S. government
stows only about 15.4 million doses of the
smallpox vaccine-enough for less
than seven percent of the
American population. The World Health
Organization (WHO) keeps
another 500,000 doses in the Netherlands, and other
national
stockpiles total about 60 million more doses of varying
quality
and potency. If the smallpox virus were released today,
the
majority of the world's population would be defenseless, and given
the
virus' 30 percent kill rate, nearly two billion people would
die."
I
can assure you that, if Saddam Hussein unleashes such a
holocaust on American
cities, the U.S. will strike Iraq with a
full nuclear retaliation strike, and
bury him. What happens then
is anybody's guess.
Here's another
thing that our news did not even pick up on.
Earthquakes, volcano eruptions,
etc. are in fact being tested all
the time against us, and could be unleashed
wholesale at any time.
This was verified by none other that then Secretary of
Defense
William S. Cohen, during a public Q&A session at an April
1997
counterterrorism conference sponsored by former Senator Sam
Nunn,
i.e., Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and
U.S.
Strategy, University of Georgia, Athens, Apr. 28, 1997.
Quoting from the
official DoD News Briefing: "Others [terrorists]
are engaging even in
an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can
alter the climate, set off
earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through
the use of electromagnetic waves...
So there are plenty of
ingenious minds out there that are at work finding
ways in which
they can wreak terror upon other nations...It's real, and
that's
the reason why we have to intensify our
[counterterrorism]
efforts." Secretary of Defense William Cohen at an April
1997
counterterrorism conference sponsored by former Senator Sam
Nunn.
Quoted from DoD News Briefing, Secretary of Defense William
S.
Cohen, Q&A at the Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of
Mass
Destruction, and U.S. Strategy, University of Georgia, Athens,
Apr.
28, 1997.
And just to keep it interesting, Castro for some decades has
run
guerrilla training camps in Southern Mexico, and infiltrated much
of
the output as trained saboteurs and guerrillas, across the Rio
Grande,
already here among our midst. Their job will be to take
out key
bridges, power stations and power lines, etc. --
destroying a great deal of
the power grid. Estimates of the
numbers vary, but it is safe to assume
about 5,000 here. Many of
the hostile Arab countries already have a
substantial number of
graduate students and students -- a percentage of which
are
terrorist agents -- here in the U.S. also, biding their time.
And
our State Department doesn't even know where they all are, or keep
up
with them.
You see, modern strategic war has changed drastically.
Now it
will be fought right in the heart of our cities, against
our
civilian population, not just our soldiers on some
distant
battlefield. The public is ill-informed and totally
unprepared.
There are no shelters, much less ones with biological
insulation
against penetration of aerosols, etc. There are nowhere
nearly
enough medical installations or personnel. There is a
laughable
amount of old smallpox vaccine, much of which is no longer fit
to
be used on humans. The newer strain of smallpox made by
the
Russians and clandestinely sold to the terrorist groups is
not
affected by the vaccine anyway. The only way to decontaminate
a
large city struck by a professional release of anthrax (100
kilograms of
anthrax spores sprayed out of a little piper cub type
aircraft on a calm
night) is by special very harsh sprays that
have been developed in secret
(they are not classified, but are
clandestine -- that's what all the
mysterious "spraying" around
the nation for more than a year has been all
about). The spray
will kill the anthrax spores, including in your lungs
if you
breath it and the spores in. But it will also kill many
people
who have respiratory problems, are feeble and old, are
little
children, etc. The terrible thing about the "new war" is that
now
the military commanders have to make decisions with the lives of
the
civil populace that used to only be made for an army in the
field. An army
commander may have to send two divisions to their
death (30,000 men) to stem
an enemy advance and save the rest of
his army. Now he may have to order a
spraying that will kill
25,000 U.S. civilians, but may save 15
million.
And once one shows symptoms of anthrax, there is really
little
that can be done about it. With the shortage of facilities,
large
numbers of casualties, shortage of antibiotics etc., triage
will
apply. Simply put, that means that anyone showing symptoms
will
probably just be laid aside to die. The treatment will
of
necessity be reserved for those for whom it may succeed.
In
short, the most likely to respond and survive are the ones who
will be
treated first, not those who are most desperately ill and
most likely to
die.
As the Chinese say, we do live in "interesting" times. This
is
the real world we live in, not the one that one reads about in
the
daily news.
Best wishes,
Tom
___________________________________
http://www.aviationnow.com/content/publication/awst/20010813/avi_view.htmAviation Week & Space Technology
13 August
2001
Biological Threat to U.S. Homeland is 'Very Real'
By
Sam Nunn
A terrorist germ attack on U.S. soil would mock all past
defense
strategies, says former U.S. Sen. Sam Nunn, who was "President"
in
a recent bio-warfare simulation of a smallpox crisis that began
in
Oklahoma City. At a recent congressional hearing, he summarized
lessons
learned from the simulation, called "Dark Winter."
-----------
We
have effectively only 12 million doses of smallpox vaccine in
America to
protect a population of 275 million that is not highly
vaccinated and is
therefore highly vulnerable.
Our [simulation] began with 20 confirmed
"cases" in Oklahoma City;
30 suspected cases spread out in Oklahoma, Georgia
and
Pennsylvania, and [there were] countless more cases of individuals
who
were infected, but didn't know it.
The effects of a bomb are bounded in
time and place. After the
explosion, the nation's leadership knows if you're
injured, and
the extent of the damage.
Smallpox, on the other hand, is
a silent, ongoing, invisible
attack. It is highly contagious and spreads in a
flash--each
smallpox victim can infect 10-20 others. Because it incubates
for
two weeks, it comes in waves.
The most insidious effect of a
biological weapons attack is that
it could turn Americans against Americans.
Once smallpox is
released, it is not the terrorists anymore who are the
threat;
your neighbors and your family members can become the threat,
and
can even become the enemy.
For more than 2,000 years, the first
rule of war has been to know
your enemy. You estimate the number of tanks and
planes and troops
of the enemy, their intelligence capabilities [and]
other
resources.
But in this case, the order of battle would be our
own people,
traveling, engaging in commerce, spreading the disease. You
don't
know who initially released [the virus], how much more [germ
agent]
they have, or where they are. The usual responses to attack
are impossible:
"Engage the enemy, open fire, stop the advance,
bring out the wounded." You
can hardly know who is wounded.
Since smallpox has not been seen in the
U.S. since 1949, very few
health care professionals would recognize the
virus. Initial cases
could be sent back home infectious, even after appearing
at
doctors' offices or emergency rooms. Laboratory facilities needed
to
diagnose the disease are inadequate and out of date.
Hospitals run at
capacity all the time; a surge in patients from
smallpox, combined with the
inevitable infections of hospital
personnel and the flight of some fearful
health care
professionals, would create a catastrophic overload.
We
have 12 million doses of vaccine, enough for one in every 23
Americans. Whom
do we decide to vaccinate?
Do you seize hotels and convert them into
hospitals? Do you close
borders and stop all travel?
What level of
force do you use to keep someone sick in isolation?
Do you keep people known,
or thought to be exposed, quarantined in
their homes? Do you guarantee
2.5-million doses of vaccine to the
military?
How do you talk to the
public in a way that is candid, yet
prevents panic--knowing that panic itself
can be a weapon of mass
destruction?
Naturally, there are some
skeptics anytime you describe a dire
threat to the U.S. I want to tell you: I
am convinced the threat
of a biological weapons attack on the U.S. is very
real. An
experiment some years ago showed that a scientist whose
specialty
was in another field was able to weaponize anthrax on his
first
attempt, for less than $250,000. Hundreds of labs and
repositories
around the world sell biological agents for legitimate
research.
We need to focus more attention, concern and resources on
the
specific threat of bioterrorism. We are considering ways to
improve
infectious disease surveillance around the globe,
including rapid detection
[through state-of-the-art sensors],
investigation and a fast and effective
response.
The national pharmaceutical stockpile should be built to
capacity
as soon as possible, and then dispersed to different sites,
which
must be secured. We don't want to fall victim to a twin attack
that
releases a bio-agent and simultaneously blows up all our
drugs and
vaccines.
Officials at the highest level of the federal government--and
at
state and local levels--need to participate in exercises like
Dark
Winter to understand the importance of advance preparation.
Theater
professionals rehearse for months before the real [event].
This is one case
where life had better imitate art--for the sake
of life
itself.
Copyright 2001 c AviationNow.com All Rights
Reserved.
http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/081701a.htm==============
And this monster
fact:
Army general and head of the PGR
releases two Israelis arrested with guns and explosives inside the Mexican
Congress
by
Ernesto Cienfuegos
La Voz de Aztlan
Los Angeles, Alta California - October 15,
2001- (ACN) In a mind-blowing development, La Voz de Aztlan has learned that
Mexican Army General Rafael Marcial Macedo de la Concha who heads the
Procuraduría General de la República (Mexican Department of Justice) has
released the retired Israeli Defense Forces colonel and presumed MOSSAD agent
Salvador Guersson Smecke and Israeli illegal immigrant Saur Ben Zvi after both
had penetrated the security of the Mexican Congress and where in possession of
guns, hand grenades and explosives.
This morning La Voz de Aztlan had a personal
telephone interview with the Mexican Congressional Press Secretary, Lic.
Adriana Lopez, and verified the arrest of the two Israelis after they had
entered through the highly secured front entrance of the Palacio Legislativo
de San Lázaro. She stated to La Voz de Aztlan that the two terrorists had
taken advantage of a situation that occurred around 1700 hours of Wednesday
October 10 when a large contingent of Sugar Industry Unionists were entering
through the metal detectors. The two Israelis followed about 50 of the
unionists to the office of the President of the Mexican Congress Beatriz
Paredes. The two Israelis were first pretending to be press photographers but
called the attention of the sugar unionists because of their nervous and out
of the ordinary behavior. About ten of the unionists confronted them and
observed that they were carrying guns and and what looked to them to be
explosives. They held the two Israelis until Official Congressional Security
personnel took them into custody. The head of Congressional Security Salvador
Alarcón verified that the Israelis had in their possession nine hand grenades,
sticks of dynamite, detonators, wiring and two 9mm "Glock" automatics.
Mexican Congressional Press Secretary Lic.
Adriana Lopez informed La Voz de Aztlan in the telephone interview that
Congressional Security then turned the terrorists Salvador Guersson Smecke,
age 34, and Saur Ben Zvi, age 27, to the Procuraduría General de la República
(Mexican Department of Justice) which is headed by Mexican Army General Rafael
Marcial Macedo de la Concha. Initial reports by the Procuraduría General de la
República (PGR) were that both Israelis worked for a private security agency
and that they both had gun permits. It turned out that there is no connection
of either suspect to any private security agency. The PGR has released the
retired Israeli I.D.F. colonel with the official explanation that he had a
legal permit to carry a gun. They also released the illegal Israeli immigrant
on about $4000 bail and the case turned over to the Mexican immigration
authorities. Mexican Congressional Press Secretary Lic. Adriana Lopez was
surprised to hear from La Voz de Aztlan of the release of the two Israelis.
La Voz de Aztlan has also learned that the
Israeli Embassy used heavy handed measures to have the two Israelis released.
Very high level emergency meetings took place between Mexican Secretary of
Foreign Relations Jorge Gutman, General Macedo de la Concha and a top Ariel
Sharon envoy who flew to Mexico City specially for that purpose. Elías Luf of
the Israeli Embassy worked night and day and their official spokeswoman Hila
Engelhart went into high gear after may hours of complete silence. What went
one during those high levels meetings no ones knows, but many in Mexico are in
disbelief at their release. Guns and any kind of explosive is highly illegal
for Mexican citizens and the fact that these two Israelis had them inside the
Mexican Congress makes their release highly suspect. What is really going on?
Jorge Gutman, the Mexican Foreign Secretary, has very strong Zionist
connections and himself is of Jewish descent. Mexican Army General Macedo de
la Concha has strong connections to the U.S. Military Industrial-Complex and
through this to the Israeli Defense Forces. Have any of these connections
influenced the decision to release the two Zionist terrorists?
The initial arrests of the two Israelis inside
the Palacio Legislativo de San Lázaro made top news on Mexico City television
and radio on the evening of October 10. TV Azteca had extensive coverage on
the first night and on the following day. La Cronica de Hoy Newspaper and El
Universal Newspaper both covered the incident the following two days but now
it seems that there is a lack of reports. The PGR has a Press Bulletin on
their official website at but they have made no updates. No U.S. media has
made any mention, that we know, except one by USAJewish.com this Sunday at:
Pravda of Moscow has a note of the initial La Voz de Aztlan article at:
What were the Israelis up to? We think we know.
The Vicente Fox government has been very careful of involving Mexico in a war
against Islam. The Mexican population as well as the two major opposition
political parties, the PRI and the PRD will not allow it. President Bush and
the U.S. Zionists want Mexico fully involved in the war principally because if
things get tough in the middle east and the oil rich Arabs leave the
coalition, the U.S. military machine is going to need alternative sources of
oil and PEMEX is just across the border. We believe that the two Zionists
terrorist were going to blow up the Mexican Congress. The second phase was to
mobilize both the Mexican and US press to blame Osama bin Laden. Most likely
then Mexico would declare war on Afghanistan as well, commit troops and all
the oil it could spare to combat Islamic terrorism.
Sharon and Putin on September
6, 2001!
Mr. Eastman,
Sorry for the early call this morning. The
following is a Washington Post
article I pulled out of their
Archives. Also, remember the Russian
passenger plane explosion a few
days after 9/11? Guess who was on board.
Thanks again for your
work.
Max
"Parallel Propaganda"
by
Jackson Diehl
October 15, 2001; Page A19
Six days before Sept. 11,
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and Russian
President Vladimir Putin --
the leaders of two countries that never used to
get along -- met in Moscow
and found one strong area of agreement: "the
danger," as Sharon put it, "of
fundamentalist, extremist Islamic terror." It
was the beginning of what is
becoming a beautiful friendship -- and one of
the most dangerous points of
weakness within the U.S. counterterrorist
alliance.
With their
handshake in the Kremlin, Sharon and Putin exchanged a common
falsehood
about the wars their armies are fighting against rebels in
Chechnya and the
West Bank and Gaza. In both cases, the underlying conflict
is about
national self-determination: statehood for the Palestinians,
self-rule for
Chechnya. The world is inclined to agree that both causes are
just. But
mixed among the insurgents in both places are Islamic extremists,
including
some who share the ideology and methods or even the funding of
Osama bin
Laden. Sharon and Putin both have tried to convince the world that
all of
their opponents are terrorists, which implies that the solution need
not
involve political concessions but merely a vigorous
counterterrorism
campaign.
Before Sept. 11 their parallel propaganda
may not have been persuasive even with each other. But in the past five weeks,
the two have been emboldened to believe that they can force the world to
accept a new understanding of the Chechens and Palestinians -- and though the
logic is no better than before, the power of Sept. 11 is working for them.
Last week President Bush again agreed that al Qaeda was operating in Chechnya
and that its fighters there should be "brought to justice"; meanwhile, bin
Laden did Sharon a favor by trumpeting the cause of the Palestinians, forcing
Yasser Arafat to open fire on pro-bin Laden demonstrators in Gaza.
In
one sense the events of Sept. 11 created an opportunity to break what have
been dismal and bloody stalemates in both Chechnya and the
Palestinian
territories. Since neither the Chechen rebel government of
Aslan Maskhadov
nor Arafat's Palestinian authority really is pro-bin Laden
-- and in fact
both have long been under threat themselves from the Islamic
extremists --
there is a chance to split them off from the terrorists. That
would both
weaken bin Laden's organization and make possible a peaceful
settlement with
the nationalists -- a double blow to the Islamic extremist
cause. The Bush
administration has tried to do just that, pressuring both
Arafat and
Maskhadov to make a clean break with the terrorists, while
urging Putin and
Sharon to open political negotiations.
Arafat and
Maskhadov, who have made use of the terrorists against a common
national
enemy, have responded ambiguously. But it's meanwhile become clear
that
neither Putin nor Sharon wants a political settlement. Each has a
different
set of war goals: Putin would like to crush Maskhadov's
Chechen
independence movement once and for all, and force Chechens to
accept the
puppet administration he has installed in the republic's ruins.
Similarly,
Sharon dreams of destroying Arafat's Palestinian Authority, an
act that
would allow him to begin imposing his own long-cherished vision of
a West
Bank dominated by a grid of Israeli territorial holdings, with
the
Palestinians squeezed into weak, disconnected cantons.
So both
Sharon and Putin have gone through the motions of talks-about-talks
with
Arafat and Maskhadov in the past two weeks, while making sure that
nothing
comes of it. Putin has set impossible conditions, demanding that
the
Chechens surrender and disarm before any negotiations begin.
Sharon
similarly demands periods of "quiet" before any talks or
confidence-building
measures, but repeatedly breaks the peace himself with
invasions of
Palestinian territory. Both meanwhile trumpet their offers of
intelligence
and logistical support to U.S. forces in Central Asia, hoping
that such
contributions, and their strident anti-terrorist rhetoric, will
overshadow
their quiet obstinacy.
It will be tempting to go along
with them. Why bother with Chechnya or the Palestinians while the war against
al Qaeda is going on? But there is a real danger: The national grievances of
the Palestinians and Chechens, though not the cause of Islamic extremism,
offer a political bridge between the terrorists and a significant sector of
mainstream society in Muslim countries. The two wars and their atrocities are
featured on the recruitment videos that al Qaeda circulates. Just as ending
them would rob the terrorists of vital oxygen, the failure to do so will make
it harder to root them out.
Even worse would be the realization of the
Putin-Sharon program -- the
crushing of legitimate Muslim national
aspirations under the guise of
counterterrorism. If the U.S. alliance
allows itself to be tied or tarred
with that strategy, there will be no
hope of victory.
___________________________________
One last last
item:
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 10:32 PM
Subject: FEMA agent spills the beans; Nationality of the five accomplices
held in Germany
About two weeks ago we heard that several suspects were arrested in
Germany
linked to the 9/11 attacks, but they would not release their
nationality or
details. Now a German official has said that the reason
they still have not released
the nationality of the suspects is that it is
"too hot."
To me this raises the suspicion that they are Americans or
Israelis -- or, at least,
not Afgan terrror shepherds pretending to be on
vacation -- otherwise, why
the big deal?
Like I say, Congress
and President know they are murdering innocent people, yet they do it
anyway for money and to save face -- and they are perfectly
content to let the real mass murderers get off scott free -- and in fact
probably profit by hundreds of billions of dollars in oil
and
laundered-northern-alliance-opium-drug money.
___________________________________
Now that we know it is a frame-up we can go back and see who held
the
necessary strategic postion to blind Uncle Sam and who also was
ready
with the exploitive "spin" instantly in play. How about that old
San
Francisco Trotskyite, Dian Feinstein (whose husband's business does
large
business deals with China's PLA.):
STATEMENT SENATOR
DIANNE FEINSTEIN ON TODAY'S TRAGEDY.
WASHINGTON - 09.11.01 | "In my view, this is an act of war against
the
United States. I join the President and the Congressional leadership
in
declaring our resolute determination to respond to this horrific attack
on
our nation. Any country or other entity who would harbor the
terrorists
responsible for this tragedy is an enemy of the United States and
we must
respond militarily. Today is a dark day in our nation's history. I
urge all
Americans to come together with a sense of unity and purpose. We
cannot
countenance such actions against the United States. To the loved ones
of
those who have been killed or injured I extend my deepest sympathy.
Their
deaths must not be in vain. As chair of the Terrorism and
Technology
Committee, I am also convinced that the need for homeland defense
and
homeland security must be our nation's number one priority."
___________________________________
Our criminal
mass-murdering elites better start adding atomic
bombs to their
frame-up -- the anthrax simply isn't a good
enough distraction
from quilt so glaringly obvious.
Dick Eastman
Yakima,
Washington
Every man is responsible to every other man.
___________________________________
"We need honest, reasoned debate, not fear mongering," Ashcroft said.
"To
those who scare peace-loving people with phantoms of lost liberty,
my
message is this: Your tactics only aid terrorists, for they erode
our
national unity and diminish our resolve. They give ammunition to
America's
enemies and pause to America's friends." -- Attorney General John
Ashcroft
Dec 2001
"Show me that age and country where the rights and liberties of the
people
were placed on the sole chance of their rulers being good men without
a
consequent loss of liberty! I say that the loss of that dearest
privilege
has ever followed, with absolute certainty, every such mad
attempt."
-- Patrick Henry
In questions of power...let no more be heard of confidence in man,
but
bind him down from mischief by the chains of the
Constitution."
--Jefferson
"Experience [has] shown that, even under the best forms [of
government],
those entrusted with power have, in time and by slow operations,
perverted
it into tyranny."
-- Jefferson
"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone
who
approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it
but
downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are
ruined."
--Patrick Henry
___________________________________
Damn! One more:
I'm talking about Iran-Contra. During this period, "former"
Mossad
officers Michael Harari and Amiram Nir worked with the White
House
and CIA to smuggle cocaine into the U.S. through Central
America.
In the process, they gave the Mossad everything they would
ever
need to personally blackmail every U.S. President since that
time.
George H. W. Bush helped run the operation and Bill
Clinton
participated as governor of Arkansas, where much of the
import
operations took place. I could name lesser officials who were
involved,
but the point is already made. Israel and the U.S. have
been
bedmates and business partners in the cocaine trade for a long
time.
Anyone who denies the foregoing facts after examining all
available
evidence is either a liar or a fool. Vince Foster is also thought
to be
both the beneficiary and victim of the Mossad. Forbes magazine
was
pursuing the story in 1995, but eventually backed off. Forbes'
Senior Editor
at the time wrote the following letter to the
White House Press
Secretary:
"Dear Mr. McCurry:
"Forbes Magazine is
preparing an article for immediate publication.
We would like to offer the
White House an opportunity to comment
on the following
assertions.
"1.) That Vincent W. Foster, while White House Deputy
Counsel,
maintained a Swiss bank account.
"2.) That funds
were paid into that account by a foreign government,
specifically the
State of Israel.
"3.) That shortly before his death and coincident
with the onset of
severe and acute depression, Vincent Foster learned
he was under
investigation by the CIA for espionage.
"4.) That
this information was made available to him by Hillary
Rodham
Clinton.
"5.) That while he was White House Deputy
Counsel and for
many years prior, Vincent Foster had been a behind-the-
scenes
control person on behalf of the National Security Agency
for
Systematics, a bank data processing company integrally involved
in a
highly secret intelligence effort to monitor world
bank
transactions.
"6.) That Systematics was also involved in
'laundering' funds
from covert operations, including drug and arms sales
related
to activities in and around Mena, Ark.
"7.) That through
Systematics' relationship with E-Systems,
Vincent Foster may have had access
to highly sensitive code,
encryption and data security information of
strategic importance.
"8.) That both prior to and after his death,
documents relating to
Systematics were removed from Vincent Foster's
office in the White
House.
"9.) That the meeting at the
Cardozo (Landau) estate on the eastern
shore of Maryland on the weekend
before Vincent Foster's death
was attended by, among others, George
Stephanopolous.
"10.) That Hillary Rodham Clinton was also a
beneficiary of funds from
Foster's Swiss account.
"Thank
you very much for your prompt attention to this matter. Please
fax your
written response before end-of-business Tuesday, April 18, to
Forbes at
212-620-2417. If you have questions, please call me at
212-620-2215.
"Respectfully yours,
"James R. Norman, Senior Editor"