EVIDENCE OF BUSH CARTEL CRIMES - AS IGNORED BY THE MEDIA
crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than have ever been
committed in the name of rebellion. - C.P. Snow
impeachable crimes, here. We’re talking high crimes and misdemeanors. We’re
talking about conspiracy and murder. We’re talking about war crimes and crimes against humanity. We’re talking about deception
and manipulation. We have the proof and we know whodunit. We even have
public confessions but the American news media is so obviously complicit in the
crimes and coverups that people don’t even worry about confessing in public any
more! And there is nothing at all we can do about it.
We have all the
evidence we need to indict the criminals. We even have the smoking gun. In
fact, we have a whole slew of smoking guns. We have mounds of testimony and
videos, memos and public statements. We have lines of witnesses and experts,
photos and newsreels. We have everything we need to charge those at the helm of
our government with some of the most heinous acts in our nation’s history.
And yet, they all will get off scot-free, without facing a single charge against
mounds of damning evidence, no one in any official capacity has dared to point a
finger of guilt against George Bush, Dick Cheney, or anyone else in their cadre of criminal
collaborators. The few voices that dared to question the legality of
administrative policies during the past four years have been muted or rendered
impotent. Those who have outlined a clear case for impeachment have been ignored
at best, and ridiculed at worst.
In no other time
have criminals at the very highest levels of the American government been
allowed to get away with such transgressions. At no other time has
evidence of guilt been so blatantly ignored and unreported by the media.
And at no other time in recent history, have the crimes of an American president
been so defended, rationalized and justified.
pick. If you’re not convinced by one, take another. Take one, take more, -
but understand that even one of the crimes on which this article will focus is
enough to make a strong and damning case against the Bush administration.
Examine the crime scenes and wonder why no one has been held accountable. Think
about the crimes that have been committed and wonder why no one in government,
not a single person, has had to answer for any of them. On the contrary, every
person directly involved in these crimes is still in his/her position, or has
been promoted or publicly acclaimed for a job well done.
These crimes were
far from perfect. They were overtly committed, and they left enough clues behind
to delight the most jaded of investigators. The smoking guns were there
for all to see, and yet, and yet, nothing. Actually at some of the crime scenes
there were smoking guns strewn all over the place. Of course the American news
media failed to take notice because their mission as it stands now is to simply
repeat what is told to them by official or corporate
And so, we’ll
narrow the list to our Top Three picks of the most dangerous crimes that
directly involve the George W. Bush Cartel and their cadre of abettors.
Take your pick.
The Bush administration
was comprised of a group of people who had published a radical foreign
policy. Elements of this policy include what is now known as the Bush
preemptive doctrine. When Paul Wolfowitz first created this policy for the
George H. W Bush administration it was dismissed as insane. This group of
people created an agenda and a strategy to advance it. This group openly stated ”Further, the process of
transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a
long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like
a new Pearl
Harbor. Domestic politics and industrial policy will shape the pace
and content of transformation as much as the requirements of current
missions.“ The Bush administration was comprised of people who had a clear
and public MOTIVE for creating or enabling the attacks of 9/11. This is a
issue that should be addressed by our media, our lawmakers, our
citizens and the rest of the world.
Every procedure that
was in place to deal with domestic hijackings was ignored on the day of the
Why did the Secret
Service feel that there was no need to protect George W. Bush?
George Bush resisted an official
into the worst national disaster since Pearl Harbor for 18 months. Any
reasonable person would want to know what happened and they would want to
make sure that there were no traitors in our mists. It was reasonable to
consider the possibilities that the people who planned an attack like this
had inside help. A president would want this checked out. George W. Bush
wanted no investigation. He already had an official story and was quickly
passed on to the press.
Every bit of evidence at
Ground Zero and the Pentagon was confiscated and
destroyed, and not preserved as crime scene evidence. This in itself is
a crime. No need to look further. This is not in dispute. The George W. Bush
is responsible for ordering or allowing the destruction of crime scene
not a shred of
that a 757 hit the Pentagon. All films from
security cameras at the scene were confiscated and never seen again. The few
frames of video from the Pentagon security camera were leaked to the public
from an anonymous source in the Pentagon. When information is leaked from
the Pentagon during a heightened state of emergency it is cause for concern.
Neither the administration or the press question this breech of security.
This is a clear indication of an intentional leak designed to sell the
official story. If a 757 had hit the Pentagon they would have released the
videos that were confiscated.
lied under oath to the Kean Commission about the warning memo that stated
bin Laden was targeting the US.
Condoleezza Rice lied when
she claimed that no one could have imagined an attack using airliners as
weapons. NORAD had
drilled for such events 2 years before the Bush White House claimed that
they never could have imagined it.
sat silently in
a classroom for seven full minutes after being informed that a second plane had
hit the WTC. Why did George W. Bush react to the attacks differently than every other
person in the nation? While every American jumped into emergency mode,
George W. Bush did not flinch. He was not worried about his own safety or
about the security of the nation. Why not?
NORAD did not send
up a single interceptor jet despite knowing that four hijackings were taking
FBI agents and bomb
sniffer dogs went through trash bins in both WTC Towers for weeks prior to
the attacks. They were suddenly removed
prior to the attack. Some people in our government were trying to do their job,
others might have been trying to prevent the job from being done.
PNAC urged President
Bill Clinton to invade Iraq, but was turned down.
PNAC member, Paul
Wolfowitz, ADMITS that it was about OIL! HE ADMITTED
THE PRESS IGNORED THIS!!! ARE YOU LISTENING! DO YOU NEED MORE PROOF THAN A
CONFESSION FROM ONE OF THE ARCHITECTS OF THE WAR??? ARE YOU LISTENING???
The PNAC thesis
“Rebuilding America’s Defenses” stated that Americans would not accept
pre-emptive wars against Iraq or Afghanistan unless there was a
‘catastrophic event like a New Pearl Harbor’ inside the country. Again we
establish motive for complicity in the events of 9/11.
In October, 2002,
George W. Bush lied to the Congress of the United States about the imminent
threat posed by Saddam Hussein. In a brazen and impeachable act, he
manipulated intelligence information in order to procure Congressional
approval for his war against Iraq.
Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld spent months assuring the American public
that their lives were in great danger unless the US waged a preventive war
against Iraq. There was no doubt about the accuracy of their information,
they said. No doubt at all. Mushroom clouds were on the horizon.
In January, 2003, George
W. Bush lied to the nation in his SOTU speech about nuclear material obtained by
Saddam. His unrelenting terror tactics and repeated references
to Iraq’s WMD’s paved the way for public acceptance for a war he had planned
In February, 2003,
Colin Powell lied to the UN on two separate occasions in a futile attempt to
convince the Security Council of the immediate threat presented by Iraq.
inspectors’ statements to the contrary, George Bush told the nation that
Saddam Hussein was not in compliance with the UN resolution requiring open
2003, boasting of a bombing strategy named ‘shock and awe,’ George
Bush invaded Iraq.
More than 100,000
Iraqi civilians have died in George Bush’s war. Nearly 1700 American
troops have lost their lives. Nearly 200 coalition forces are dead. Untold
thousands are maimed. The carnage continues and civil war is imminent.
The minutes of the
meeting between George Bush and Tony Blair revealed an agreement to
attack Iraq months before the invasion itself.
George W. Bush
violated international law by waging a preventive war on a non-threatening,
sovereign nation. That illegal war continues to this day.
THE ABUSE AND TORTURE
OF PRISONERS – WHAT WE KNOW:
On May 7th, 2002, the US
officially withdrew from the International
Criminal Court (ICC). The US now has immunity from the court for
US citizens suspected of atrocities. US soldiers serving overseas are immune
from prosecution in the court, while politicians and US officials, including
CIA operatives, can claim diplomatic immunity.
Shortly after 9/11, WH
legal counsel, Alberto
Gonzalez, drafted a memo in which he virtually changed the rules of
prisoner treatment. The memo declared the war on terror to be conflict
against a vast, outlaw, international enemy in which the rules of war,
international treaties and even the Geneva Conventions did not apply.
Alberto Gonzales was subsequently appointed US Attorney General.
In January, 2002,
the WH legal department issued another memo concluding that neither the
Geneva Conventions nor any of the laws of war applied to the conflict in
In February of 2002,
George Bush signed a secret order authorizing the CIA. To set up a series of
secret detention facilities outside the United States, and to question those
held in them with unprecedented harshness. •The Bush administration then
began to send terror suspects to other countries for interrogation, thereby
absolving the US of blame for torture applied elsewhere.
In 2003, Abu Ghraib
was formally handed over to tactical control of military-intelligence units
for the expressed purpose of extracting information from detainees.
As an outcome of
regular inspections, the International Commission of the Red Cross broke its
rule of secrecy by publicly complaining of the systemic abuse of prisoners,
in Iraq and Afghanistan, detailing methods of abuse that were in clear
violation of international law.
In 2004, hundreds of
photographs and video tapes were released that revealed shocking methods of
abuse and torture of detainees in Abu Ghraib prison.
complaints about abuse, no investigation of prisoner treatment was held
until it was clear these photographs were about to be leaked to the media.
contractors were employed to carry out ‘interrogations’ of detainees.
Many of the
detainees had committed no crimes, but had been arrested in huge sweeps of
Iraqi men intended to secure information about insurgent attacks.
conducted and supervised by military intelligence operatives who ordered
that prisoners be ‘softened up’ for questioning.
Abuses often were
sexual in nature, preying upon the cultural sensitivities of Moslem men
regarding nudity and public sexual acts.
Abuses were systemic
throughout Iraq and Guantanamo Bay.
Hundreds of other
photos and videos were kept secret by the Pentagon, and have recently been
ordered released to the public.
administration attributed the abuse to the work of a few ‘bad apple’
underlings, and denied any knowledge or approval by anyone in the
Reports of Koran
desecration at Guantanamo were corroborated by the Pentagon.
To date, civilian
aircraft continue to fly terror suspects to other countries for harsh and
illegal interrogation methods.
To date, no one in the
Pentagon or the White House has been held accountable for the widespread
abuse and torture of prisoners. To date, only enlisted personnel have been
charged with any abuses or torture. To date, further investigations have