By Dick Eastman
The following article posted at Rense.com is just the coverup. Let me tell you, below, what is really happening.
Contrailing over the East Coast recently create cloud cover that is then blown by the prevailing westerlies over the western Atlantic. The cloud cover over the water prevented enough of the sun's rays from reaching the ocean surface causing the surface to be several degrees colder than it would have been otherwise, than it is normally. The colder water surface has meant less warming of the air directly above the sea's surface and thus less convective rising of warmer air and thus greater-than-otherwise pressure, more compressing and sinking and less expanding and lifting. This-higher than-otherwise pressure has blocked the winds that push the gulf stream northeastward, i.e., the prevailing westerlies. This has caused the gulf stream, a current warmer tropics-heated waters pushed north by those winds to slow in its flow -- meaning, for now, hundreds of millions of dollars of longer heating bills as winter persists -- this pays for the weather modification procedure -- stopping the gulf stream with contrailing results in increased oil revenues -- but of course the corporations are not looking at what families must foregoe in order to pay for these increased heating expenses -- the clandestine weather modifications operate in secret so they are not held accountable. A few educated people with science backgrounds see what is going on, but with no officials or professional news media validating the finding (because they too are owned by the people who sell the oil and operate the weather modifcation planes) who's to stop them?
Similar technology was used repeatedly in the 90's to stop the south equatorial current, creating the El Nino effect that destroyed millions of acres of farm production and created disastrous storms in the US and elsewhere. Money for billionaires who own large overseas agribusiness that sells food to the US -- also a Bonanza for those in the disaster relief industries and FEMA.
Figuring that out was easy. Finding a way to convince others and then organize them to the point where they can exert political influence powerful enough to counter the billionaires trillions and stop this nightmare super crime is another matter.
from rense .com who got it from The Observer.
· Secret report warns of rioting and nuclear war
· Britain will be 'Siberian' in less than 20 years
· Threat to the world is greater than terrorism
Mark Townsend and Paul Harris in New York
Sunday February 22, 2004
Climate change over the next 20 years could result in a global catastrophe costing millions of lives in wars and natural disasters.
A secret report, suppressed by US defence chiefs and obtained by The Observer, warns that major European cities will be sunk beneath rising seas as Britain is plunged into a 'Siberian' climate by 2020. Nuclear conflict, mega-droughts, famine and widespread rioting will erupt across the world.
The document predicts that abrupt climate change could bring the planet to the edge of anarchy as countries develop a nuclear threat to defend and secure dwindling food, water and energy supplies. The threat to global stability vastly eclipses that of terrorism, say the few experts privy to its contents.
'Disruption and conflict will be endemic features of life,' concludes the Pentagon analysis. 'Once again, warfare would define human life.'
The findings will prove humiliating to the Bush administration, which has repeatedly denied that climate change even exists. Experts said that they will also make unsettling reading for a President who has insisted national defence is a priority.
The report was commissioned by influential Pentagon defence adviser Andrew Marshall, who has held considerable sway on US military thinking over the past three decades. He was the man behind a sweeping recent review aimed at transforming the American military under Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.
Climate change 'should be elevated beyond a scientific debate to a US national security concern', say the authors, Peter Schwartz, CIA consultant and former head of planning at Royal Dutch/Shell Group, and Doug Randall of the California-based Global Business Network.
An imminent scenario of catastrophic climate change is 'plausible and would challenge United States national security in ways that should be considered immediately', they conclude. As early as next year widespread flooding by a rise in sea levels will create major upheaval for millions.
Last week the Bush administration came under heavy fire from a large body of respected scientists who claimed that it cherry-picked science to suit its policy agenda and suppressed studies that it did not like. Jeremy Symons, a former whistleblower at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), said that suppression of the report for four months was a further example of the White House trying to bury the threat of climate change.
Senior climatologists, however, believe that their verdicts could prove the catalyst in forcing Bush to accept climate change as a real and happening phenomenon. They also hope it will convince the United States to sign up to global treaties to reduce the rate of climatic change.
A group of eminent UK scientists recently visited the White House to voice their fears over global warming, part of an intensifying drive to get the US to treat the issue seriously. Sources have told The Observer that American officials appeared extremely sensitive about the issue when faced with complaints that America's public stance appeared increasingly out of touch.
One even alleged that the White House had written to complain about some of the comments attributed to Professor Sir David King, Tony Blair's chief scientific adviser, after he branded the President's position on the issue as indefensible.
Among those scientists present at the White House talks were Professor John Schellnhuber, former chief environmental adviser to the German government and head of the UK's leading group of climate scientists at the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research. He said that the Pentagon's internal fears should prove the 'tipping point' in persuading Bush to accept climatic change.
Sir John Houghton, former chief executive of the Meteorological Office - and the first senior figure to liken the threat of climate change to that of terrorism - said: 'If the Pentagon is sending out that sort of message, then this is an important document indeed.'
Bob Watson, chief scientist for the World Bank and former